The EVEREST trial suggests MitraClip® for mitral regurgitation is effective
You don't need to be Editor-In-Chief to add or edit content to WikiDoc. You can begin to add to or edit text on this WikiDoc page by clicking on the edit button at the top of this page. Next enter or edit the information that you would like to appear here. Once you are done editing, scroll down and click the Save page button at the bottom of the page.
April 1, 2008 By Vijayalakshmi Kunadian MBBS MD MRCP [1]
SCAI-ACCi2 08-Chicago, IL: Percutaneous mitral valve repair with the Mitraclip® device for functional mitral regurgitation is effective with low major adverse events and significant reverse remodeling at one year in the initial EVEREST cohort. Dr. James Hermiller presented the results at the SCAI-i2 summit Annual Scientific Sessions in Chicago today. This presentation was followed by a commentary by Dr. Todd K. Rosengart, Stony Brook NY.
The EVEREST study evaluated the safety and efficacy of isolated leaflet repair using the MitraClip® device in patients with functional mitral regurgitation. This new device enables proper coaptation of the mitral valve leaflets. The investigators hypothesized that this might result in a reduction of left ventricular volume overload by reducing the amount of mitral regurgitation.
This study consisted of patients aged 18 years or older (n=23) with functional moderate to severe (3+) or severe (4+) mitral regurgitation who were symptomatic. This study also consisted of asymptomatic patients with a LV ejection fraction < 60% or an LV end systolic diameter > 40mm. In addition, the MR was required to be due to A2-P2 mal-coaptation, the patients were required to be candidates for mitral valve surgery and transseptal puncture was required to be feasible. The exclusion criteria consisted of patients with LVEF < 25% or LV end systolic dimensions (LVESD) >55 mm, renal impairment, patients with endocarditis and rheumatic heart disease.
The implantation of the clip was attempted in all patients. Acute procedural success was achieved in 83% of cases. Following discharge 53% of cases had grade 1 mitral regurgitation. There was a significant improvement in the LV end systolic/diastolic dimension from baseline to 12 months [4.5 cm vs. 4 cm (p=<0.03)/6 cm vs. 5.4 cm (p<0.04)]. There was a significant improvement in the LV end diastolic volume between baseline and 12 months (208 ml vs. 178 ml, p=0.006).
During 36 month follow-up, the event free survival (free from death, mitral valve surgery or mitral regurgitation grade > 2) was 74%. 89% of patients were free of mitral regurgitation grade 2 at 36 months of follow-up. Three patients underwent cardiac surgery following clip implantation.
The investigators of the EVEREST study concluded that the Mitraclip® device is effective in reducing functional mitral regurgitation. There was a significant improvement in LV remodeling at 1 year and there was clinical improvement among patients with NYHA class I. Approximately 79% of patients had freedom from death, surgery for valve dysfunction and MR >2+ at 1-year.
This study is limited by the fact that it is not randomized consisting of a small number of patients.
Source
Late Breaking Clinical Trials Session: SCAI Annual Scientific Sessions in partnership with ACC i2 summit, April 1, 2008 Chicago
Reference
Acknowledgement and Attribution Regarding Sources of Content
Some of the initial content on this page may be incorporated in part from copyleft sources in the public domain including wikis such as Wikipedia and AskDrWiki. Drug information for patients came from the The National Library of Medicine. Infectious disease information may have come from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Differential Diagnoses are drawn from clinicians as well as an amalgamation of 3 sources: 1.The Disease Database; 2. Kahan, Scott, Smith, Ellen G. In A Page: Signs and Symptoms. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing, 2004:3; 3. Sailer, Christian, Wasner, Susanne. Differential Diagnosis Pocket. Hermosa Beach, CA: Borm Bruckmeir Publishing LLC, 2002:7 .

