Serratia infection laboratory findings

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Serratia infection Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Serratia infection from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Chest X Ray

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Serratia infection laboratory findings On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Serratia infection laboratory findings

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Serratia infection laboratory findings

CDC on Serratia infection laboratory findings

Serratia infection laboratory findings in the news

Blogs on Serratia infection laboratory findings

Directions to Hospitals Treating Serratia infection

Risk calculators and risk factors for Serratia infection laboratory findings

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]

Overview

Diagnosis of Serratia infection is made by growth of Serratia in culture media. Other laboratory findings are non-specific.

Laboratory Findings

Laboratory findings may be non-specific and depend on the site of infection.

Culture Growth

Procedure

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the following procedure should be followed to properly culture Serratia:[1]

  • Biosafety Level: 2
  • Medium: Trypticase Soy Agar with 5% Sheep Blood (BAP)
  • Growth Conditions:
  • Temperature: 35 °C (95 °F)
  • Atmosphere: Aerobic
  • Procedure
  • Remove the sample vial to a container with dry ice or a freezer block. Keep vial on ice or block. (Do not let vial content thaw)
  • Open vial aseptically to avoid contamination
  • Using a sterile loop, remove a small amount of frozen isolate from the top of the vial
  • Aseptically transfer the loop to BAP
  • Use streak plate method to isolate single colonies
  • Incubate inverted phase at 35 °C (95 °F) for 18-24 hours

MIC Results and Interpretation

The following table demonstrates the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) results following Serratia culture/antibiogram and interpretation:

MIC (µg/ml) Results and Interpretation
Drug MIC Interpretation
Amikacin 2 S
Amoxicillin/Clavulanic Acid * > 32 R
Ampicillin > 32 R
Ampicillin/Sulbactam > 32 R
Aztreonam 16 R
Cefazolin > 32 R
Cefepime ≤ 0.5 S
Cefotaxime ≤ 1 S
Cefoxitin 2 S
Ceftazidime 1 S
Ceftriaxone ≤ 1 S
Ciprofloxacin ≤ 0.12 S
Colistin > 4 _
Doripenem _ _
Ertapenem > 16 R
Gentamicin 0.5 S
Imipenem > 32 R
Imipenem + chelators ** _ _
Levofloxacin ≤ 0.25 S
Meropenem > 16 R
Piperacillin/Tazobactam * 2 S
Polymyxin B > 4 _
Tetracycline 8 I
Tigecycline *** 1 S
Tobramycin 1 S
Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole (TMP - SMX) 2 S

* Reflects MIC of first component
** Screen for metallo-beta-lactamase production[2]
*** Based on FDA break points
Abbreviations: MIC=Minimum inhibitory concentration; I=Intermediate; R=Resistant; S=Susceptible
Table adapted from Antimicrobial Resistance Bank - Serratia marcescens. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.[3]

References

  1. Antimicrobial Resistance Bank - Serratia marcescens. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. http://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/pdf/0122.pdf. Accessed on January 5 2016
  2. Rasheed JK, Kitchel B, Zhu W, Anderson KF, Clark NC, Ferraro MJ; et al. (2013). "New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae, United States". Emerg Infect Dis. 19 (6): 870–8. doi:10.3201/eid1906.121515. PMC 3713825. PMID 23731823.
  3. Antimicrobial Resistance Bank - Serratia marcescens. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. http://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/pdf/0122.pdf. Accessed on January 5 2016