Recall bias

WikiDoc Resources for Recall bias
Articles
Most recent articles on Recall bias Most cited articles on Recall bias Review articles on Recall bias Articles on Recall bias in N Eng J Med, Lancet, BMJ
Media
Powerpoint slides on Recall bias Images of Recall bias Photos of Recall bias Podcasts & MP3s on Recall bias Videos on Recall bias
Evidence Based Medicine
Cochrane Collaboration on Recall bias Bandolier on Recall bias TRIP on Recall bias
Clinical Trials
Ongoing Trials on Recall bias at Clinical Trials.gov Trial results on Recall bias Clinical Trials on Recall bias at Google
Guidelines / Policies / Govt
US National Guidelines Clearinghouse on Recall bias NICE Guidance on Recall bias NHS PRODIGY Guidance FDA on Recall bias CDC on Recall bias
Books
Books on Recall bias
News
Recall bias in the news Be alerted to news on Recall bias News trends on Recall bias
Commentary
Blogs on Recall bias
Definitions
Definitions of Recall bias
Patient Resources / Community
Patient resources on Recall bias Discussion groups on Recall bias Patient Handouts on Recall bias Directions to Hospitals Treating Recall bias Risk calculators and risk factors for Recall bias
Healthcare Provider Resources
Symptoms of Recall bias Causes & Risk Factors for Recall bias Diagnostic studies for Recall bias Treatment of Recall bias
Continuing Medical Education (CME)
CME Programs on Recall bias
International
Recall bias en Espanol Recall bias en Francais
Business
Recall bias in the Marketplace Patents on Recall bias
Experimental / Informatics
List of terms related to Recall bias

In psychology, recall bias (or reporting bias) is a type of systematic bias which occurs when the way a survey respondent answers a question is affected not just by the correct answer, but also by the respondent's memory. This can affect the results of the survey. As a hypothetical example, suppose that a survey in 2005 asked respondents whether they believed that O.J. Simpson had killed his wife, 10 years after the criminal trial. Respondents who believed him innocent might be more likely to have forgotten about the case, and therefore to state no opinion, than respondents who thought him guilty. If this is the case, then the survey would find a higher-than-accurate proportion of people who believed that Simpson did kill his wife.

Relatedly but distinctly, the term might also be used to describe an instance where a survey respondent intentionally responds incorrectly to a question about their personal history which results in response bias. As a hypothetical example, suppose that a researcher conducts a survey among women of group A, asking whether they have had an abortion, and the same survey among women of group B.

If the results are different between the two groups, it might be that women of one group are less likely to have had an abortion, or it might simply be that women of one group who have had abortions are less likely to admit to it. If the latter is the case, then this would skew the survey results; this is a kind of response bias. (It is also possible that both are the case: women of one group are less likely to have had abortions, and women of one group who have had abortions are less likely to admit to it. This would still affect the survey statistics.)

In experimental sciences, "reporting bias" refers to a tendency to under-report unexpected or undesirable experimental results, attributing the results to experimental error, while being more trusting of expected or desirable results, though these may be subject to the same experimental errors. Over time, reporting bias can lead to a status quo where multiple investigators discover and discard experimental results, and later experimenters justify their own reporting bias by observing that previous experimenters reported different results (even though those earlier experimenters may have fallen victim to a weaker case of reporting bias). Thus, each incident of reporting bias can make future incidents more likely.