Polycystic kidney disease laboratory tests

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Polycystic kidney disease Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Polycystic kidney disease from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factor

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

X-Ray

CT

MRI

Ultrasound

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Interventions

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Polycystic kidney disease laboratory tests On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Polycystic kidney disease laboratory tests

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Polycystic kidney disease laboratory tests

CDC on Polycystic kidney disease laboratory tests

Polycystic kidney disease laboratory tests in the news

Blogs on Polycystic kidney disease laboratory tests

Directions to Hospitals Treating Polycystic kidney disease

Risk calculators and risk factors for Polycystic kidney disease laboratory tests

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Aarti Narayan, M.B.B.S [2]

Overview

Laboratory tests

Blood tests

Urinalysis

Urine culture

Genetic testing

  • A definite diagnosis of ADPKD relies on imaging or molecular genetic testing. The sensitivity of testing is nearly 100% for all patients with ADPKD who are age 30 years or older and for younger patients with PKD1 mutations; these criteria are only 67% sensitive for patients with PKD2 mutations who are younger than age 30 years.
  • Large echogenic kidneys without distinct macroscopic cysts in an infant/child at 50% risk for ADPKD are diagnostic.
  • In the absence of a family history of ADPKD, the presence of bilateral renal enlargement and cysts, with or without the presence of hepatic cysts, and the absence of other manifestations suggestive of a different renal cystic disease provide presumptive, but not definite, evidence for the diagnosis.
  • Molecular genetic testing by linkage analysis or direct mutation screening is available clinically; however, genetic heterogeneity is a significant complication to molecular genetic testing.
  • Sometimes a relatively large number of affected family members need to be tested in order to establish which one of the two possible genes is responsible within each family.
  • The large size and complexity of PKD1 and PKD2 genes, as well as marked allelic heterogeneity, present obstacles to molecular testing by direct DNA analysis.
  • In the research setting, mutation detection rates of 50-75% have been obtained for PKD1 and ~75% for PKD2.
  • Clinical testing of the PKD1 and PKD2 genes by direct sequence analysis is now available, with a detection rate for disease-causing mutations of 50-70%.
  • Genetic counseling may be helpful for families at risk for polycystic kidney disease.

References

Template:WH Template:WS