Gastrointestinal perforation laboratory findings

Jump to navigation Jump to search


Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mohammed Abdelwahed M.D[2]

Gastrointestinal perforation Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating gastrointestinal perforation from other diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

X-Ray

CT

MRI

Echocardiography or Ultrasound

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Gastrointestinal perforation laboratory findings On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Gastrointestinal perforation laboratory findings

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Gastrointestinal perforation laboratory findings

CDC on Gastrointestinal perforation laboratory findings

Gastrointestinal perforation laboratory findings in the news

Blogs on Gastrointestinal perforation laboratory findings

Directions to Hospitals Treating Stomach cancer

Risk calculators and risk factors for Gastrointestinal perforation laboratory findings

Overview

Laboratory studies for gastrointestinal perforation include Complete blood count, electrolytes, liver function tests, and renal function tests.

Gastrointestinal perforation laboratory findings

Laboratory studies for gut perforation include:[1][2][3]

References

  1. Pieper-Bigelow C, Strocchi A, Levitt MD (1990). "Where does serum amylase come from and where does it go?". Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 19 (4): 793–810. PMID 1702756.
  2. Wu Z, Freek D, Lange J (2014). "Do normal clinical signs and laboratory tests exclude anastomotic leakage?". J Am Coll Surg. 219 (1): 164. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.03.044. PMID 24952453.
  3. Olubuyide IO, Brown NM, Higginson J, Whicher JT (1989). "The value of C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of intestinal perforation in typhoid fever". Ann Clin Biochem. 26 ( Pt 3): 246–8. doi:10.1177/000456328902600307. PMID 2764469.