Tooth impaction
|
WikiDoc Resources for Tooth impaction |
|
Articles |
|---|
|
Most recent articles on Tooth impaction Most cited articles on Tooth impaction |
|
Media |
|
Powerpoint slides on Tooth impaction |
|
Evidence Based Medicine |
|
Clinical Trials |
|
Ongoing Trials on Tooth impaction at Clinical Trials.gov Trial results on Tooth impaction Clinical Trials on Tooth impaction at Google
|
|
Guidelines / Policies / Govt |
|
US National Guidelines Clearinghouse on Tooth impaction NICE Guidance on Tooth impaction
|
|
Books |
|
News |
|
Commentary |
|
Definitions |
|
Patient Resources / Community |
|
Patient resources on Tooth impaction Discussion groups on Tooth impaction Patient Handouts on Tooth impaction Directions to Hospitals Treating Tooth impaction Risk calculators and risk factors for Tooth impaction
|
|
Healthcare Provider Resources |
|
Causes & Risk Factors for Tooth impaction |
|
Continuing Medical Education (CME) |
|
International |
|
|
|
Business |
|
Experimental / Informatics |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Jaspinder Kaur, MBBS[2]
Synonyms and keywords:
Overview
Impacted and embedded teeth are the two main types of unerupted teeth found in the mouth, and can sometimes be confused with each other. In both cases, the teeth remain below the surface of the gum, rather than erupting into an exposed position within the mouth, but the reason for the failure to erupt differs. Impacted teeth result from a situation in which an unerupted tooth is wedged against another tooth or teeth or otherwise located so that it cannot erupt normally. In contrast, an embedded tooth is an unerupted tooth that is covered, usually completely, with bone. That is to say, something that is physically blocking the pathway of eruption (such as another tooth) is the case for an impacted tooth, whereas the lack of eruptive force results in an embedded tooth.
Mandibular third molars are the most commonly found unerupted teeth, while maxillary third molars are second most common.
Tooth impactions are prevalent in clinical practice. The order of frequency of tooth impaction includes mandibular and maxillary third molars, maxillary canines, mandibular premolars, mandibular canines, maxillary premolars, maxillary central incisors, maxillary lateral incisors, and mandibular second molars. In most cases, a diagnosis of supernumerary or impacted teeth is based on clinical symptoms and radiographic examination; the most common diagnoses are made by panoramic, occlusal, and periapical radiographs. Hence, diagnosis is based on clinical examination coupled with imaging, especially cone beam CT (CBCT) scans. Treatment of impacted teeth should be based on clinical symptoms, location of the teeth, and a comprehensive examination of the impact of these teeth on neighboring teeth. Good Orthodontic mechanics, surgical planning, and patient education is essential to success. Surgical considerations include local anatomic concerns, anesthesia method, flap design, bone removal/coronal exposure, surgical instrumentation, bonding material characteristics, tooth ankylosis, and minimization of surgical complications.
Historical Perspective
Classification
- Tooth impaction is classified based on various factors which are elaborated in following tables:
Table 1: Winter’s and Pell & Gregory’s criteria
| Classification | Clinical description | Type |
|---|---|---|
| Pell and Gregory classification | Impaction depth: the relation of the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) of the third molar with the bone level is graded |
|
| Pell and Gregory classification | Ramus relationship: the position of the distal surface of the third molar crown in relation to the anterior border of the ascending ramus is categorized |
|
| Winter’s classification | Impaction angulation: the angle between the longitudinal axis of the second and third molars (which was measured by an orthodontic protractor) is categorized |
|
| Nature of overlying tissue | This system is used by most dental insurance companies and one by which surgeon charges for his services. |
|
Pathophysiology
- Impacted teeth can be classified as entirely or partially unerupted teeth. The most common impacted teeth are the third molars since they are the last to erupt and usually remain impacted due to the lack of space in the dental arch. Partially erupted impacted third molars (ITM) have been associated with odontogenic infections, such as caries, periodontal diseases, and pericoronitis. Due to difficulties in reaching partially erupted teeth during oral hygiene, dental caries and endodontic illnesses are more frequently observed in comparison to entirely unerupted teeth. On the other hand, non-inflammatory conditions such as the dentigerous cysts (DC), odontogenic keratocysts (OKC), and ameloblastomas are mostly related to entirely unerupted ITM.
Causes of Tooth Impaction
Differentiating Tooth Impaction from other Diseases
Table 2: Enlist the differential diagnosis for tooth impaction
| System involved | Characteristic features |
|---|---|
| Cleidocranial dysostosis | Short tapered fingers and broad thumbs; flat feet; knock knees; short shoulder blades (scapulae); scoliosis; short skull (brachycephaly); a prominent forehead; wide-set eyes (hypertelorism); a flat nose; small upper jaw; impacted and crowded teeth. |
| Gardners syndrome | Multiple impacted and supernumerary teeth, multiple jaw osteomas, multiple odontomas, congenital hypertrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium (CHRPE), and multiple adenomatous colonic polyps. |
| Gorlin–Sedano syndrome | Short hands, short foot bones, short and straight collar bone, and multiple impacted teeth. |
| Yunis–Varon Syndrome | Agenesis or hypoplasia of clavicle, severe micrognathia, digital anomalies, hypodontia, spinal defects, and impacted teeth. |
| Osteogenesis Imperfecta | Blue sclera, abnormal and impacted teeth, hearing problems, osteoporosis, wormian bones, joint laxity, and short stature. |
Epidemiology and Demographics
Risk Factors
Screening
Natural history, Complications, and Prognosis
- In the United States, approximately 3 billion dollars are spent yearly on the extraction of third molars. The prophylactic removal of asymptomatic ITM is a commonly performed procedure in oral surgery clinics worldwide. Reasons for extracting ITM include the risk of developing dental caries, pericoronitis, periodontal defects, crowding, and occurrence of different odontogenic cysts and tumors. However, there is a lack of substantial evidence supporting the extraction of asymptomatic ITM, especially considering the morbidity and the costs of the procedure. Thus, further investigations on this topic are necessary to aid surgeons in the decision-making process. The presence of odontogenic cysts and tumors in the third molar region can cause severe consequences, such as pathological mandibular fracture and facial asymmetry. Nonetheless, surgical removal of ITM might present complications, which might occur in up to 15% of cases, such as nerve injuries, post-operative infections, and iatrogenic mandibular fractures. Therefore, the clinical conduct regarding asymptomatic ITM should weigh the risks of removal and benefits of tooth preservation.
Diagnosis
Staging | History & Symptoms | Physical Examination | Laboratory Tests | Chest X Ray | CT | MRI | Echocardiography or Ultrasound | Other Imaging Findings | Other Diagnostic Studies
Treatment
Medical Therapy | Surgery | Primary Prevention | Secondary Prevention | Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy | Future or Investigational Therapies
References