Splenic infarction surgery

Revision as of 16:03, 21 September 2012 by Aditya Govindavarjhulla (talk | contribs) (→‎Surgery)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Splenic infarction Microchapters

Home

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Splenic Infarction from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

Chest X Ray

CT

MRI

Ultrasound

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Splenic infarction surgery On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Splenic infarction surgery

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Splenic infarction surgery

CDC on Splenic infarction surgery

Splenic infarction surgery in the news

Blogs on Splenic infarction surgery

Directions to Hospitals Treating Splenic infarction

Risk calculators and risk factors for Splenic infarction surgery

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]

Overview

Surgery

  • For an infarcted spleen with any of the above-mentioned complications, splenectomy is required.
  • Because of the small but real risk of fatal overwhelming post splenectomy sepsis, splenic preservation is preferable whenever possible.
  • In cases of torsion of a wandering spleen, splenopexy with splenic salvage is the procedure of choice in the well-perfused, non infarcted spleen.
  • Complications such as bleeding or pseudocyst formation also may be amenable to splenic salvage using techniques of partial splenectomy.
  • While a unilocular abscess can be managed successfully in select cases with percutaneous catheter drainage, some authors advocate splenectomy in all cases of splenic infarct and abscess, questioning the utility of preserving the residual partially functioning spleen. This may be accomplished using traditional open techniques or laparoscopic techniques.
  • Perisplenic inflammation and dense adhesions can make splenectomy difficult. Another choice is to perform preoperative splenic artery embolization, which purposely infarcts the remaining spleen and minimizes blood loss that otherwise can be quite profuse in these difficult dissections.

Intraoperative ligation of the splenic artery at the superior margin of the pancreas in the lesser sac is another alternative to minimize blood loss if the spleen is enlarged.

Contraindications
  • Asymptomatic infarct without complication does not require surgical intervention.
  • Overall, most splenic infarcts do not require surgical intervention.

References

Template:WH Template:WS