Schistosomiasis other diagnostic studies

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Schistosomiasis Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Schistosomiasis from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

X-ray

Echocardiography and Ultrasound

CT scan

MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Schistosomiasis other diagnostic studies On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Schistosomiasis other diagnostic studies

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Schistosomiasis other diagnostic studies

CDC on Schistosomiasis other diagnostic studies

Schistosomiasis other diagnostic studies in the news

Blogs on Schistosomiasis other diagnostic studies

Directions to Hospitals Treating Schistosomiasis

Risk calculators and risk factors for Schistosomiasis other diagnostic studies

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] ; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Aditya Ganti M.B.B.S. [2]

Overview

There are no other diagnostic studies associated with schistosomiasis.

Other diagnostic studies

Formalin-ethyl acetate sedimentation

  • Five grammes of stool is mixed, strained, diluted with normal saline solution and centrifuged
  • The sediment is collected and treated with formalin-ethyl acetate and subsequently used for slide preparation
  • A single formalin-ethyl acetate sedimentation test is not as sensitive for detection of low-intensity infection as multiple Kato-Katz smears

Urine testing for schistosome eggs

  • The classic method used for identification of S.haematobium eggs is filter concentration of a urine sample collected over 4 hours (ending around noon) into a jug with formalin preservative
  • 10 mL of urine is filtered through a 12-μm pore membrane that traps the eggs, and the membrane surface then is examined under a microscope.
  • Standard microscopic urinalysis will not identify low-intensity Schistosoma infections.
  • Each separate microscopic urinalysis has a sensitivity of 55% to 62% for detection of low-intensity infection; therefore, at least three different urine samples need to be evaluated to achieve diagnostic accuracy.

Schistosomal antigen testing (urine or serum)

  • Urine sample is taken for measurement of circulating cathodic antigen released by schistosomes or serum sample for measurement of both circulating cathodic and anodic antigen.[1]
  • Identifies active infection rather than past infection
  • May not be sufficiently sensitive for detection of low-intensity infection

Serologic testing

  • Serologic testing help in detection of Schistosoma-specific antibodies in serum. These tests include:
  • More useful for evaluating recent travelers than immigrants, as it is not possible to distinguish between active infection and past infection.
  • Due to the long life of schistosomes, positive test results cannot be discounted simply because exposure was historically distant.
  • Sensitivity is highest when the assay is targeted to the suspected species (S.mansoni, S.japonicum, or S.haematobium)

Biopsy of tissue

  • A biopsy specimen is obtained from the rectum during anoscopy, genital tissues, or the urinary bladder wall during cystoscopy and then crushed and examined under a microscope
  • S.mansoni and S.japonicum eggs can be identified in crushed random rectal biopsy specimens.
  • S.haematobium eggs can be identified in crushed biopsy specimens from genital tissues or the urinary bladder wall
  • Sensitivity of microscopic analysis of six crushed rectal biopsies is similar to that of two Kato-Katz thick smears.
  • Liver biopsy is notoriously insensitive for diagnosis of schistosomiasis; a negative liver biopsy result does not exclude infection
  • Standard sectioned intestinal biopsies are not sufficiently sensitive for diagnosis of intestinal schistosomiasis.

PCR to detect schistosomal DNA

Other laboratory tests Other diagnostic tests that are helpful in diagnosis of schistosomiasis include:

Photomicrography of bladder in S. hematobium infection, showing clusters of the parasite eggs with intense eosinophilia, Source: CDC

References

  1. van Etten L, Folman CC, Eggelte TA, Kremsner PG, Deelder AM (1994). "Rapid diagnosis of schistosomiasis by antigen detection in urine with a reagent strip". J. Clin. Microbiol. 32 (10): 2404–6. PMC 264074. PMID 7814474.