PCI in the calcified lesion: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 96: Line 96:
{{WikiDoc Help Menu}}
{{WikiDoc Help Menu}}
{{WikiDoc Sources}}
{{WikiDoc Sources}}
{{mdr}}

Revision as of 13:18, 6 August 2010

WikiDoc Resources for PCI in the calcified lesion

Articles

Most recent articles on PCI in the calcified lesion

Most cited articles on PCI in the calcified lesion

Review articles on PCI in the calcified lesion

Articles on PCI in the calcified lesion in N Eng J Med, Lancet, BMJ

Media

Powerpoint slides on PCI in the calcified lesion

Images of PCI in the calcified lesion

Photos of PCI in the calcified lesion

Podcasts & MP3s on PCI in the calcified lesion

Videos on PCI in the calcified lesion

Evidence Based Medicine

Cochrane Collaboration on PCI in the calcified lesion

Bandolier on PCI in the calcified lesion

TRIP on PCI in the calcified lesion

Clinical Trials

Ongoing Trials on PCI in the calcified lesion at Clinical Trials.gov

Trial results on PCI in the calcified lesion

Clinical Trials on PCI in the calcified lesion at Google

Guidelines / Policies / Govt

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse on PCI in the calcified lesion

NICE Guidance on PCI in the calcified lesion

NHS PRODIGY Guidance

FDA on PCI in the calcified lesion

CDC on PCI in the calcified lesion

Books

Books on PCI in the calcified lesion

News

PCI in the calcified lesion in the news

Be alerted to news on PCI in the calcified lesion

News trends on PCI in the calcified lesion

Commentary

Blogs on PCI in the calcified lesion

Definitions

Definitions of PCI in the calcified lesion

Patient Resources / Community

Patient resources on PCI in the calcified lesion

Discussion groups on PCI in the calcified lesion

Patient Handouts on PCI in the calcified lesion

Directions to Hospitals Treating PCI in the calcified lesion

Risk calculators and risk factors for PCI in the calcified lesion

Healthcare Provider Resources

Symptoms of PCI in the calcified lesion

Causes & Risk Factors for PCI in the calcified lesion

Diagnostic studies for PCI in the calcified lesion

Treatment of PCI in the calcified lesion

Continuing Medical Education (CME)

CME Programs on PCI in the calcified lesion

International

PCI in the calcified lesion en Espanol

PCI in the calcified lesion en Francais

Business

PCI in the calcified lesion in the Marketplace

Patents on PCI in the calcified lesion

Experimental / Informatics

List of terms related to PCI in the calcified lesion

Cardiology Network

Discuss PCI in the calcified lesion further in the WikiDoc Cardiology Network
Adult Congenital
Biomarkers
Cardiac Rehabilitation
Congestive Heart Failure
CT Angiography
Echocardiography
Electrophysiology
Cardiology General
Genetics
Health Economics
Hypertension
Interventional Cardiology
MRI
Nuclear Cardiology
Peripheral Arterial Disease
Prevention
Public Policy
Pulmonary Embolism
Stable Angina
Valvular Heart Disease
Vascular Medicine

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]
Associate Editors-In-Chief: John N. Mafi, M.D.; Randall K. Harada, M.D.; Thomas Tu, M.D.; Brian C. Bigelow, M.D.

Please Take Over This Page and Apply to be Editor-In-Chief for this topic: There can be one or more than one Editor-In-Chief. You may also apply to be an Associate Editor-In-Chief of one of the subtopics below. Please mail us [2] to indicate your interest in serving either as an Editor-In-Chief of the entire topic or as an Associate Editor-In-Chief for a subtopic. Please be sure to attach your CV and or biographical sketch.

Challenges of Calcified Lesions

  • The presence of coronary calcification also reduces the ability to cross chronic total occlusions. In severely calcified lesions, stent strut expansion is inversely correlated with the circumferential arc of calcium. [1]
  • The presence of extensive coronary calcification poses unique challenges for PCI as calcium in the vessel wall leads to irregular and inflexible lumens. It also makes the delivery of guidewires, balloons, and stents much more challenging.
  • Extensive coronary calcification also renders the vessel wall rigid, necessitating higher balloon inflation pressures to obtain complete stent expansion, and occasionally leading to “undilatable” lesions that resist any achievable balloon expansion pressure.

Calcification in Saphenous Vein Grafts (SVGs)

Calcification noted within SVGs are generally within the reference vessel wall rather than within the lesion, and they are often associated with older graft age, insulin–dependent diabetics, and smoking. [2]

Angiographic Evaluation

Coronary artery calcium is an important marker for coronary atherosclerosis. Conventional coronary angiography has limited sensitivity for the detection of smaller amounts of calcium, and has moderate sensitivity for the detection of extensive lesion calcium (sensitivity 60% and 85% for three- and four-quadrant calcium, respectively). [3]

Treatment

There are a variety of diagnostic and treatment options for calcified lesions. Better early outcomes may be achieved by using a multi-device interventional strategy.

Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty (PTCA)

PTCA is an invasive cardiologic therapeutic procedure to treat the stenotic (narrowed) coronary arteries of the heart. The term balloon angioplasty is commonly used to describe this procedure, which describes the inflation of a balloon within the coronary artery to crush the plaque into the walls of the artery.

In the treatment of calcified lesions with PTCA, certain considerations must be made. For one, interventional cardiologists should consider using hydrophilic guidewires, as heavy calcification may make wire advancement difficult. Also, calcified plaques usually require higher balloon pressures to fully expand than normal plaques. Because of this, non-compliant balloons may be a better choice than compliant or semi-compliant balloons. Differential expansion of compliant or semi-compliant balloons inside a particular lesion may jeopardize less diseased segments if the balloon expands greater than the vessel's native diameter. On the contrary, non-compliant balloons allow for a more uniform expansion at high pressures and therefore may be a better choice to apply focused pressure at the calcified plaque. Another option is to place a second "buddy" wire adjacent to the balloon to improve the ability to dilate calcified plaque.

If pre-dilatation fails to fully expand a calcified stenosis, then the risks and benefits of stent deployment should be carefully considered due to the risk of incomplete expansion and future restenosis.

Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS)

IVUS is a medical imaging methodology that uses a specially designed catheter with a miniaturized ultrasound probe attached to the distal end of the catheter. The proximal end of the catheter is attached to computerized ultrasound equipment. It allows the application of ultrasound technology to see from inside blood vessels out through the surrounding blood column, visualizing the endothelium (inner wall) of blood vessels in living individuals. IVUS is used in the coronary arteries to determine the amount of atheromatous plaque built up at any particular point in the epicardial coronary artery.

While coronary angiography by fluroscopy is limited in its detection and severity assessment of coronary calcification, IVUS can assess the extent of calcification and may be particularly useful for instances when the reason for poor balloon expansion is uncertain. Although this approach has its advantages over angiography, heavy involvement of superficial, sub-endothelial calcification may require rotational atherectomy.

Cutting Balloon and FX MiniRailTM

A cutting balloon is an angioplasty device used in percutaneous coronary interventions. It has a special balloon tip with small blades, that are activated when the balloon is inflated. This procedure is different from rotational atherectomy, in which a diamond tipped device spins at high revolutions to cut away calcific (chalky) atheroma usually prior to coronary stenting.

This technique can be useful in treating calcified lesions because the microsurgical blades on the surface of the balloon may help to score and modify calcified plaques. Generally, if a cutting balloon will cross the lesion, a stent can be delivered. Although this technique has its advantages, there are certain additional considerations that must be made before deciding to use this procedure. For one, despite their usefulness, these balloons are often more difficult to deliver past tortuous or calcified segments, so extra care must be used. Also, there were no significant differences observed in rates of restenosis when using this procedure.

Rotational Atherectomy

Rotational atherectomy is a minimally invasive method of removing plaque and blockages from an artery and subsequently widening arteries that have been narrowed by arterial disease. Unlike angioplasty and stents of blocked arteries that simply push blockages aside into the wall of the artery, rotational atherectomy involves inserting a thin catheter with a rotating blade on its end into the artery. The rotating edge is used to remove plaque buildups, thereby opening the artery and restoring normal blood flow.

Rotational atherectomy is frequently employed following unsuccessful pre-dilating PTCA to perform plaque modification. This procedure facilitates PTCA by creating micro-fractures, removing calcified plaque, and increasing vessel compliance. Despite its usefulness in treating calcified lesions, certain precautions should be taken. In an effort to limit the risk of vessel laceration, smaller diameter burrs are now preferred. A general guideline to use is that the initial burr to luminal ratio should be 1:2. Additional caution should be taken when a coronary dissection is present, as rotational atherectomy may propagate the dissection.

  • Rotational atherectomy in severe lesion calcification: Rotational atherectomy is the preferred pretreatment method in patients with severe lesion calcification, particularly ostial lesions, and facilitates the delivery and expansion of coronary stents by creating microdissection planes within the fibrocalcific plaque. Yet even with these contemporary methods, the presence of moderate or severe coronary calcification is associated with reduced procedural success and higher complication rates[4], including stent dislodgement.
  • Rotational atherectomy in mild-moderate calcifications: In less severely calcified lesions, no differences in restenosis rates were found after paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation in calcified and non-calcified vessels. [5]

Directional Coronary Atherectomy (DCA)

DCA involves inserting a thin, flexible catheter with a small blade on its end into the artery, which cuts off plaque buildups. These plaque shavings are caught with the catheter and are subsequently removed from the artery.[6]

One problem that may arise during the procedure is that heavy calcification proximal to the target lesion may limit deliverability of the device and its success.

Excimer Laser Coronary Atherectomy/Angioplasty (ECLA)

ECLA uses a laser, instead of a traditional blade, to perform atherectomy and angioplasty. The excimer laser is a pulsed ultraviolet laser that can erode calcified plaque while also causing minimal thermal tissue injury.[7]

One advantage of using ELCA is that it fractures calcified plaques, thereby facilitating PTCA. However, it also has a higher equipment cost and has a lesser ease of use than rotational atherectomy. Furthermore, it is more commonly used in lower extremity peripheral arterial disease than in coronary artery disease (CAD).

Stents

In cardiology, a stent is a tube that is inserted into an artery to counteract significant decreases in vessel diameter by acutely propping it open.

In the treatment of calcified lesions, stents are frequently used in conjunction with PTCA or atherectomy to decrease the risk of restenosis. Extra care should be taken in deploying stents in lesions where incomplete expansion occurs following pre-dilation, as incomplete expansion of a target lesion will increase the likelihood of restenosis. Stents should be deployed only after ensuring full balloon expansion.


Summary

In summary, heavily calcified lesions add complexity to a percutaneous coronary intervention. Other major points to remember include:

  • Incomplete expansion of a target lesion will increase the likelihood of restenosis.
  • Rotational atherectomy is frequently employed following unsuccessful pre-dilating PTCA to perform plaque modification.
  • Stents should be deployed only after ensuring full balloon expansion.


References

  1. Vavuranakis M, Toutouzas K, Stefanadis C, Chrisohou C, Markou D, Toutouzas P (2001). "Stent deployment in calcified lesions: can we overcome calcific restraint with high-pressure balloon inflations?". Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 52 (2): 164–72. PMID 11170322. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  2. Castagna MT, Mintz GS, Ohlmann P; et al. (2005). "Incidence, location, magnitude, and clinical correlates of saphenous vein graft calcification: an intravascular ultrasound and angiographic study". Circulation. 111 (9): 1148–52. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000157160.69812.55. PMID 15723972. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  3. Mintz GS, Popma JJ, Pichard AD; et al. (1995). "Patterns of calcification in coronary artery disease. A statistical analysis of intravascular ultrasound and coronary angiography in 1155 lesions". Circulation. 91 (7): 1959–65. PMID 7895353. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  4. Wilensky RL, Selzer F, Johnston J; et al. (2002). "Relation of percutaneous coronary intervention of complex lesions to clinical outcomes (from the NHLBI Dynamic Registry)". Am. J. Cardiol. 90 (3): 216–21. PMID 12127606. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  5. Moussa I, Ellis SG, Jones M; et al. (2005). "Impact of coronary culprit lesion calcium in patients undergoing paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation (a TAXUS-IV sub study)". Am. J. Cardiol. 96 (9): 1242–7. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.06.064. PMID 16253590. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  6. http://www.lvhn.org/lvh/Your_LVH/Health_Care_Services/Heart_Care_MIMS/Most_Advanced_Treatments%7C3487
  7. Cook SL, Eigler NL, Shefer A, Goldenberg T, Forrester JS, Litvack F (1991). "Percutaneous excimer laser coronary angioplasty of lesions not ideal for balloon angioplasty". Circulation. 84 (2): 632–43. PMID 1860207. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)


Template:SIB

Template:WikiDoc Sources