Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 screening

Revision as of 21:34, 25 September 2015 by Ammu Susheela (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 from other Diseases

Epidemiology & Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications & Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Criteria

History & Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

X Ray

CT

MRI

Echocardiography or Ultrasound

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 screening On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 screening

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 screening

CDC on Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 screening

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 screening in the news

Blogs on Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 screening

Directions to Hospitals Treating Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2

Risk calculators and risk factors for Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 screening

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Ammu Susheela, M.D. [2]

Overview

According to the [guideline name], screening for multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 by RET gene testing is recommended for children with increased risk of Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 with increased risk of Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2.

Screening

  • The DNA-based testing of the c-RET gene can be easily performed on a blood sample at any age. It offers the opportunity for early identification of the c-RET germline mutations, thus contributing to the reduction of morbidity and mortality of MEN2 syndrome. In fact, the early recognition of the mutant gene carriers makes possible the prevention and cure of MTC, by performing a prophylactic thyroidectomy before the clinical expression of the tumor. This test is also of importance to detect and thus, to reduce the risk of an unsuspected PHEO. Moreover, the aggressiveness of MTC correlates with the specific c-RET codon mutation and this strong genotype-phenotype correlation ulteriorly contributes to the clinical management of patients. Specific c-RET mutations, in fact, are associated to peculiar clinical phenotypes and thus to different course and prognosis of the disease.
  • During the Seventh International Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Meeting in Gubbio in 1999 [6], the risk of MTC has been stratified in three categories according to the mutations of c-RET as following.
Risk Stratification
Gene Risk
Children with MEN2B and/or c-RET codon 883, 918,

922

Highest risk of aggressive MTC
Children with any c-RET codon 611, 618, 620 or 634

mutations

High risk of MTC
Children with c-RET codon 609, 768, 790, 791, 804

and 891 mutations

Less aggressive and slowly growing MTC
  • Ionized calcium level yearly for MEN 2A
  • Parathyroid hormone level yearly for MEN 2A
  • Catacholamines, epinephrine and norepinephrine yearly for MEN 2A and MEN 2B
  • Magnetic resonance imaging and computerized tomography for pheochromocytoma every 2-4 years