Industrial and organizational psychology: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
VisualWikitext
Line 82: Line 82:
====Openness to experience====
====Openness to experience====
Openness to experience affects job performance<ref name="Barrick1991"/><ref name="pmid27631555">{{cite journal| author=Hildenbrand K, Sacramento CA, Binnewies C| title=Transformational leadership and burnout: The role of thriving and followers' openness to experience. | journal=J Occup Health Psychol | year= 2018 | volume= 23 | issue= 1 | pages= 31-43 | pmid=27631555 | doi=10.1037/ocp0000051 | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=27631555  }} </ref>.
Openness to experience affects job performance<ref name="Barrick1991"/><ref name="pmid27631555">{{cite journal| author=Hildenbrand K, Sacramento CA, Binnewies C| title=Transformational leadership and burnout: The role of thriving and followers' openness to experience. | journal=J Occup Health Psychol | year= 2018 | volume= 23 | issue= 1 | pages= 31-43 | pmid=27631555 | doi=10.1037/ocp0000051 | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=27631555  }} </ref>.
=====Personality traits====
According to a meta-analysis, " the strongest predictor of engagement (31.10% of the explained variance; ρ = .62), followed by proactive personality (19.60%; ρ = .49), conscientiousness (14.10%; ρ = .39), and extraversion (12.10%; ρ = .40), whereas neuroticism, negative affectivity, agreeableness, and openness to experience were the least important"<ref>Young, H. R., Glerum, D. R., Wang, W., & Joseph, D. L. (2018). Who are the most engaged at work? A meta‐analysis of personality and employee engagement. Journal of Organizational Behavior {{doi|10.1002/job.2303}}</ref>.


=====Learning and performance goal orientations=====
=====Learning and performance goal orientations=====

Revision as of 21:20, 29 November 2018

Template:Tocright Robert G. Badgett, M.D.[1]

Industrial and organizational psychology is "the branch of applied psychology concerned with the application of psychologic principles and methods to industrial problems including selection and training of workers, working conditions, etc."[1]

Organizational culture and climate

Organizational culture is "beliefs and values shared by all members of the organization. These shared values, which are subject to change, are reflected in the day to day management of the organization"[2]. Components of culture have beed descbied based on anthropology[3][4][5].

Organizational states

Flourishing

Flourishing involves a positive state of psychological or social well-being and positive functioning (not necessarily learning) and addresses life in general rather than just work.[6] However, the concept is variably conceptualized thus making it difficult to study.[7]

Important contributors to flourishing focus on relationships with others at work and are[8]:

  • Giving to others (due to impact on meaningfulness)
  • Task assistance receipt (due to impact on job satisfaction)
  • Friendship (due to positive emotions at work)
  • Personal growth (due to impact on life satisfaction).

A short scale to measure flourishing has been proposed.[9]

Thriving

Thriving has two components according to factor analysis[10]:

  • Vitality. In this analysis, vitality is very similar to Schaufeli's Vigor subscale of the EWES-9 Engagement scale (see 'Engagement' below)
  • Sense of learning or improvement

A separate body of research has emerged more recently that gives a broader definition to thriving, but does not cite the above research that has used factor analysis to identify core features[11].

Thriving is negatively correlated with burnout[12][13]; however, this benefit may be confined to employees with a high openness to experience[13]

Thriving is fostered among employees whose regulatory focus is promotional by a "employee involvement climate", defined as having employees who "mutually understand that they (a) possess the power to make decisions and act on them, (b) may access and share the informational resources needed to undertake those actions effectively, (c) have opportunities to update their knowledge in order to continually develop their effectiveness, and (d) are rewarded for improving the effectiveness of their work unit and organization"[14].

Engagement

Engagement has three dimensions according to factor analysis[15]:

  • Vigor (physical engagement)
  • Dedication (effective engagement)
  • Absorption (cognitive engagement)

Engagement can be measured by several validated scales[16][17].

Engagement depends on both organizational factors and personnel personality[18].

Engagement is association with organizational success[19][20]

Satisfaction

Satisfaction with work is a "pleasurable or positive emotional state resulting from the appraisal of one's job or job experiences”[21].

Burnout

Main article: Burnout (psychology)

Antecedents

Regarding engagement and job satisfaction, meaningfulness of work strongly correlates[22]


The key antecedent of thriving is proposed to be self-determination, which includes autonomy, competence, and relatedness.[23] This emphasis links thriving to self-determination theory of Deci.[24] Studies have validated autonomy as an antecedent of thriving[25].

How to foster thriving has been reviewed[26][27][28] and includes:

  • Providing decision-making discretion
  • Sharing Information. Using transparency and open book management
  • Minimize incivility at work
  • Provide performance feedback
  • Promote diversity
  • Mastery of tasks. In 1908, the Yerkes-Dodson law[29], and later the concept of 'flow' by Csikszentmihalyi[30], both propose that engagement is strongest when a task is intermediate in difficulty.

Characteristics of individuals

The "Big Five personality traits" are[31][32][33]:

  • Openness to experience
  • Conscientiousness
  • Extraversion
  • Agreeableness
  • Neuroticism

Of these, conscientiousness[34], openness to experience[34][13] and extroversion[34], may affect job performance. The effect may be complicated as open to experience may be positively related to individual and organizational proactivity but negatively related to team and organizational proficiency[33].

Openness to experience

Openness to experience affects job performance[34][13].

=Personality traits

According to a meta-analysis, " the strongest predictor of engagement (31.10% of the explained variance; ρ = .62), followed by proactive personality (19.60%; ρ = .49), conscientiousness (14.10%; ρ = .39), and extraversion (12.10%; ρ = .40), whereas neuroticism, negative affectivity, agreeableness, and openness to experience were the least important"[35].

Learning and performance goal orientations

Three goal orientations have been proposed[36]:

  • Learning goal orientation
  • Performance‐prove orientation
  • Performance‐avoid orientation
Regulatory focus

Two regulatory focuses are[37][14]:

  • Promotion focus is associated with "growth and developmental needs and involves striving for ideals, aspirations, and rewards through accomplishment"
  • Prevention focus is associated with "needs for security and safety"
Calling

Calling is defined as[38]:

"A calling is a transcendent summons, experienced as originating beyond the self, to approach a particular life role in a manner oriented toward demonstrating or deriving a sense of purpose or meaningfulness and that holds other-oriented values and goals as primary sources of motivation."

Calling is associated with engagement[39] and well-being[40].

Characteristics of a job

Empowerment

Empowerment has four dimensions according to factor analysis[41]:

  • Meaningfulness or purpose
  • Competence or efficacy
  • Self-determination
  • Impact

Perception of empowerment by employees can be measured with Spreitzer's Measuring Empowerment survey which measures[42]:

  • Meaning
  • Competence
  • Self-determination
  • Impact

Empowerment affects thriving[43].

Moral distress

Moral distress, as operationalized in research studies, is the report by healthcare personnel of participating in the provision of healthcare that the healthcare personnel perceives as inappropriate due to pressure from other health care professionals or administrators of families that the health care professional perceives as inappropriate due to being[44][45]:

  • Unnecessary or futile due to family wishes[46]
  • Suboptimal or insufficient. For example due to lack of funding, coordination, or continuity of care[47].
  • Deceptive. For example, not obtaining consent, not discussing end-of-life care, giving false hope, or not disclosing intravenous medications[47].

Although the use of ‘distress’ in the label suggests a negative emotional state, it’s definition inferred by measurement scales developed and used in research is that moral distress is not a state but rather is the report of participation in events that a reasonable person would interpret as distressing.

Moral distress may also be called moral injury.

Moral distress may be more common in nurses and pharmacists than physicians[48][49][50][46][51][52]. The American Association of Critical-Care Nurses has created a position statement about moral distress, "The 4 A’s to Rise Above Moral Distress."[53]

Scales have been developed to measure moral distress[44][47]

For underlying causes, moral distress negatively correlates with perception of empowerment by healthcare personnel[54].

Moral distress has been studied for correlation with states of workforce wellbeing:

  • Not correlated with engagement[55]
  • Negatively correlated with job satisfaction[48]
  • Positively correlated with burnout[48][49][50]; however, this has not been found in all studies[55][56]. In a separate study, moral distress correlated with the depersonalization component of burnout and just missed correlation with emotional exhaustion[57].

Theory and models of antecedents, indicators, and outcomes

Yerkes-Dodson Law suggestions that the relationship between performance and arousal is bell-shaped so that performance may decrease with excessive arousal. This is similar to work by Csikszentmihaly[58].

The concept of "competence frustration" (versus "flow") suggests a similar bell-shaped relationship between task difficulty and engagement[59]

Self-determination theory

Self-determination theory was proposed in the early 1980s.[60] In this theory, autonomy, mastery, and purpose have been validated as components[61][62].

Culture and Climate

Employee involvement climate, defined as having employees who "mutually understand that they (a) possess the power to make decisions and act on them, (b) may access and share the informational resources needed to undertake those actions effectively, (c) have opportunities to update their knowledge in order to continually develop their effectiveness, and (d) are rewarded for improving the effectiveness of their work unit and organization" is associated with thriving among employees whose regulatory focus is promotional[14].

The role of work climate has been examined in studies based on complexity science[63][64], in order to predict why quality improvement projects succeed[65][66][67] and fail[68].

However, attributes of culture study may not be well based on theory and linked to the above settings.[69]

A reciprocal, beneficial relationship has been proposed between a positive work climate and mission goals[70]. This may be similar the Matthew effect[71].

Interventions to promote positive organizational psychology

Available studies have been reviewed.[72] Studies using appreciative inquiry have been done.[73][74]

Public reporting has been used to try to improve organizational culture.[75][76] Recommendations for how to report have been proposed.[77][78]

Switching to a flatter organizational structure may help[79].

Leadership

Main article: Leadership

Organizational decision making and conflict resolution

Organizational decision making is "the process by which decisions are made in an institution or other organization". [80]

Consensus

Group members may overestimate the degree of consensus[81]. This may be due to difficulty in inferring the opinion of a teammember.

On the other hand, in a non-randomized study that did not account for baseline conflicts, voting was associated with dissatisfaction[82]. It may be likely that these teams chose to vote because of diversity of perspectives whereas teams that choose consensus had more baseline homogeneity. In addition, post-decision voice was not clearly used.

After voting on organizational procedures, postdecisional voice by the minority group can reduce negative impact on perceptions of fairness and task commitment by employees in the voting minority. [83] In the study by Hunton, postdecisional voice was solicited by asking voters "their thoughts and feelings" about the options debated. Participants were also told that their postdecisional voice was "noninstrumental" and would not change the choice[83].

Delphi technique

A Delphi technique may be more effective.[84]

The Delphi technique involves[85]:

  1. Identifying a research problem
  2. Completing a literature search
  3. Developing a questionnaire of statements
  4. Conducting anonymous iterative mail or e-mail questionnaire rounds
  5. Providing individual and/or group feedback between rounds
  6. Summarizing the findings

A modified Delphi had been developed by the RAND Corporation.[86][87]

The technique can vary regarding anonymity of participants and the number of iterations or rounds.

The Delphi Technique can be conducted online either asynchronously via email[88] or synchronously using a software such as ExpertLens.[89][90]

Organizations

See also

References

  1. ↑ Anonymous (2024), Industrial psychology (English). Medical Subject Headings. U.S. National Library of Medicine.
  2. ↑ Anonymous (2024), Organizational culture (English). Medical Subject Headings. U.S. National Library of Medicine.
  3. ↑ Schein, E. H. (1984). Coming to a new awareness of organizational culture. Sloan management review, 25(2), 3-16.
  4. ↑ Schein, E. H. (1983). The role of the founder in creating organizational culture. Organizational dynamics, 12(1), 13-28.
  5. ↑ Kluckhohn, F. R., & Strodtbeck, F. L. (1961). Variations in value orientations. Oxford, England: Row, Peterson.
  6. ↑ Spreitzer, Gretchen, et al. "A socially embedded model of thriving at work." Organization science 16.5 (2005): 537-549. doi:10.1287/orsc.1050.0153
  7. ↑ Hone, Lucy Clare, et al. "Measuring flourishing: The impact of operational definitions on the prevalence of high levels of wellbeing." (2014): 62-90. doi:10.5502/ijw.v4i1.4
  8. ↑ Colbert, Amy E., Joyce E. Bono, and Radostina K. Purvanova. "Flourishing via workplace relationships: Moving beyond instrumental support." Academy of Management Journal 59.4 (2016): 1199-1223. doi:10.5465/amj.2014.0506
  9. ↑ Diener, Ed, et al. "New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings." Social Indicators Research 97.2 (2010): 143-156. doi:10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y
  10. ↑ Porath, C., Spreitzer, G., Gibson, C., & Garnett, F. G. (2012). Thriving at work: Toward its measurement, construct validation, and theoretical refinement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(2), 250-275. doi:10.1002/job.756
  11. ↑ Feeney, B. C., & Collins, N. L. (2015). A new look at social support: A theoretical perspective on thriving through relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19(2), 113-147. doi:10.1177/1088868314544222
  12. ↑ Porath, Christine; Spreitzer, Gretchen; Gibson, Cristina; Garnett, Flannery G. (2011-05-19). "Thriving at work: Toward its measurement, construct validation, and theoretical refinement". Journal of Organizational Behavior. Wiley-Blackwell. 33 (2): 250–275. doi:10.1002/job.756. ISSN 0894-3796.
  13. ↑ 13.0 13.1 13.2 13.3 Hildenbrand K, Sacramento CA, Binnewies C. "Transformational Leadership and Burnout: The Role of Thriving and Followers' Openness to Experience". J Occup Health Psychol. doi:10.1037/ocp0000051. PMID 27631555. Unknown parameter |= ignored (help)
  14. ↑ 14.0 14.1 14.2 Wallace, J. C., Butts, M. M., Johnson, P. D., Stevens, F. G., & Smith, M. B. (2016). A Multilevel Model of Employee Innovation: Understanding the Effects of Regulatory Focus, Thriving, and Employee Involvement Climate. Journal of Management, 42(4), 982–1004. doi:10.1177/0149206313506462
  15. ↑ Schaufeli, Wilmar B.; Bakker, Arnold B.; Salanova, Marisa (2006). "The Measurement of Work Engagement With a Short Questionnaire". Educational and Psychological Measurement. SAGE Publications. 66 (4): 701–716. doi:10.1177/0013164405282471. ISSN 0013-1644.
  16. ↑ Schaufeli, W. B. (2006). The Measurement of Work Engagement With a Short Questionnaire: A Cross-National Study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701–716. doi:10.1177/0013164405282471
  17. ↑ Rich, B. L., Lepine, J. A., & Crawford, E. R. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of management journal, 53(3), 617-635 doi:10.5465/AMJ.2010.51468988
  18. ↑ Young, Henry R.; Glerum, David R.; Wang, Wei; Joseph, Dana L. (2018). "Who are the most engaged at work? A meta-analysis of personality and employee engagement". Journal of Organizational Behavior. doi:10.1002/job.2303. ISSN 0894-3796.
  19. ↑ Schneider, B., Yost, A. B., Kropp, A., Kind, C., & Lam, H. (2017). Workforce engagement: What it is, what drives it, and why it matters for organizational performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior. {doi:10.1002/job.2244
  20. ↑ Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: a meta-analysis. Journal of applied psychology, 87(2), 268.
  21. ↑ Locke EA. Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. In: Dunnette MD, editor. Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology [Internet]. 1st ed. Chicago: Rand McNally; 1976 [cited 2016 Dec 24]. p. 1297–343. Available from: http://www.edwinlocke.com
  22. ↑ 1. Allan BA, Batz‐Barbarich C, Sterling HM, Tay L. Outcomes of Meaningful Work: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Management Studies [Internet]. [cited 2018 Nov 20];0(0). Available from:Error: Bad DOI specified!
  23. ↑ Spreitzer, Gretchen M., and Christine Porath. "Self-determination as nutriment for thriving: Building an integrative model of human growth at work." The Oxford handbook of work engagement, motivation, and self-determination theory (2014): 245-258.
  24. ↑ Deci, Edward L., James P. Connell, and Richard M. Ryan. "Self-determination in a work organization." Journal of applied psychology 74.4 (1989): 580. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.74.4.580
  25. ↑ Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of management Journal, 38(5), 1442-1465. doi:10.2307/256865
  26. ↑ Spreitzer, Gretchen, Christine L. Porath, and Cristina B. Gibson. "Toward human sustainability: How to enable more thriving at work." Organizational Dynamics 41.2 (2012): 155-162. doi:10.1016/j.orgdyn.2012.01.009
  27. ↑ Spreitzer, Gretchen, and Christine Porath. "Creating sustainable performance." Harvard Business Review 90.1 (2012): 92-99.
  28. ↑ Spreitzer, Gretchen, Christine L. Porath, and Cristina B. Gibson. Thriving at Work: Why It's Important and How to Enable More of It HBR Leadership & Managing People Case Study. 2012
  29. ↑ Yerkes, R. M., & Dodson, J. D. (1908). The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit‐formation. Journal of comparative neurology and psychology, 18(5), 459-482.
  30. ↑ Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Csikszentmihalyi, I. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety (Vol. 721). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  31. ↑ Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual review of psychology, 41(1), 417-440. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.002221
  32. ↑ Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: a meta‐analysis. Personnel psychology, 44(1), 1-26. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x
  33. ↑ 33.0 33.1 Neal, A., Yeo, G., Koy, A., & Xiao, T. (2012). Predicting the form and direction of work role performance from the Big 5 model of personality traits. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(2), 175-192. doi:10.1002/job.742
  34. ↑ 34.0 34.1 34.2 34.3 Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: a meta‐analysis. Personnel psychology, 44(1), 1-26. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x
  35. ↑ Young, H. R., Glerum, D. R., Wang, W., & Joseph, D. L. (2018). Who are the most engaged at work? A meta‐analysis of personality and employee engagement. Journal of Organizational Behavior doi:10.1002/job.2303
  36. ↑ Elliot, A. J., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 461–475. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.461
  37. ↑ Higgins, E. T. 1997. Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52: 1280-1300.
  38. ↑ Dik, B. J., & Duffy, R. D. (2009). Calling and Vocation at Work: Definitions and Prospects for Research and Practice. The Counseling Psychologist, 37(3), 424–450. doi:10.1177/0011000008316430
  39. ↑ Chen, J., May, D. R., Schwoerer, C. E., & Augelli, B. (2018). Exploring the Boundaries of Career Calling: The Moderating Roles of Procedural Justice and Psychological Safety. Journal of Career Development, 45(2), 103–116. doi:10.1177/0894845316671214
  40. ↑ Yoon, J. D., Daley, B. M., & Curlin, F. A. (2017). The Association Between a Sense of Calling and Physician Well-Being: A National Study of Primary Care Physicians and Psychiatrists. Academic Psychiatry, 41(2), 167–173. doi:10.1007/s40596-016-0487-1
  41. ↑ Spreitzer, G. M. (1995-10-01). "PSYCHOLOGICAL, EMPOWERMENT IN THE WORKPLACE: DIMENSIONS, MEASUREMENT AND VALIDATION". Academy of Management Journal. The Academy of Management. 38 (5): 1442–1465. doi:10.2307/256865. ISSN 0001-4273.
  42. ↑ Spreitzer, Gretchen M. "Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation." Academy of management Journal 38.5 (1995): 1442-1465. doi:10.2307/256865
  43. ↑ Walumbwa, F. O., Muchiri, M. K., Misati, E., Wu, C., & Meiliani, M. (2016). Fired Up To Perform: A Multilevel Examination of Antecedents and Consequences of Thriving At Work. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2016(1), 10494. doi:10.5465/AMBPP.2016.79
  44. ↑ 44.0 44.1 Corley, M. C., Elswick, R. K., Gorman, M., & Clor, T. (2001). Development and evaluation of a moral distress scale. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 33(2), 250–256 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2001.01658.x
  45. ↑ Moss M, Good VS, Gozal D, Kleinpell R, Sessler CN (2016). "A Critical Care Societies Collaborative Statement: Burnout Syndrome in Critical Care Health-care Professionals. A Call for Action". Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 194 (1): 106–13. doi:10.1164/rccm.201604-0708ST. PMID 27367887.
  46. ↑ 46.0 46.1 Dodek PM, Wong H, Norena M, Ayas N, Reynolds SC, Keenan SP; et al. (2016). "Moral distress in intensive care unit professionals is associated with profession, age, and years of experience". J Crit Care. 31 (1): 178–82. doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.10.011. PMID 26596697.
  47. ↑ 47.0 47.1 47.2 Hamric, A. B., Borchers, C. T., & Epstein, E. G. (2012). Development and Testing of an Instrument to Measure Moral Distress in Healthcare Professionals. AJOB Primary Research, 3(2), 1–9. doi:10.1080/21507716.2011.652337
  48. ↑ 48.0 48.1 48.2 Johnson-Coyle L, Opgenorth D, Bellows M, Dhaliwal J, Richardson-Carr S, Bagshaw SM (2016). "Moral distress and burnout among cardiovascular surgery intensive care unit healthcare professionals: A prospective cross-sectional survey". Can J Crit Care Nurs. 27 (4): 27–36. PMID 29786979.
  49. ↑ 49.0 49.1 Whitehead PB, Herbertson RK, Hamric AB, Epstein EG, Fisher JM (2015). "Moral distress among healthcare professionals: report of an institution-wide survey". J Nurs Scholarsh. 47 (2): 117–25. doi:10.1111/jnu.12115. PMID 25440758.
  50. ↑ 50.0 50.1 Neumann JL, Mau LW, Virani S, Denzen EM, Boyle DA, Boyle NJ; et al. (2018). "Burnout, Moral Distress, Work-Life Balance, and Career Satisfaction among Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Professionals". Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 24 (4): 849–860. doi:10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.11.015. PMID 29196079.
  51. ↑ de Boer JC, van Rosmalen J, Bakker AB, van Dijk M (2016). "Appropriateness of care and moral distress among neonatal intensive care unit staff: repeated measurements". Nurs Crit Care. 21 (3): e19–27. doi:10.1111/nicc.12206. PMID 26380963.
  52. ↑ Houston S, Casanova MA, Leveille M, Schmidt KL, Barnes SA, Trungale KR; et al. (2013). "The intensity and frequency of moral distress among different healthcare disciplines". J Clin Ethics. 24 (2): 98–112. PMID 23923809.
  53. ↑ McCue C (2010). "Using the AACN framework to alleviate moral distress". Online J Issues Nurs. 16 (1): 9. doi:10.3912/OJIN.Vol16No01PPT02. PMID 21800929.
  54. ↑ Altaker KW, Howie-Esquivel J, Cataldo JK (2018). "Relationships Among Palliative Care, Ethical Climate, Empowerment, and Moral Distress in Intensive Care Unit Nurses". Am J Crit Care. 27 (4): 295–302. doi:10.4037/ajcc2018252. PMID 29961665.
  55. ↑ 55.0 55.1 Mason VM, Leslie G, Clark K, Lyons P, Walke E, Butler C; et al. (2014). "Compassion fatigue, moral distress, and work engagement in surgical intensive care unit trauma nurses: a pilot study". Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 33 (4): 215–25. doi:10.1097/DCC.0000000000000056. PMID 24895952.
  56. ↑ Shoorideh FA, Ashktorab T, Yaghmaei F, Alavi Majd H (2015). "Relationship between ICU nurses' moral distress with burnout and anticipated turnover". Nurs Ethics. 22 (1): 64–76. doi:10.1177/0969733014534874. PMID 24948793.
  57. ↑ Sajjadi S, Norena M, Wong H, Dodek P (2017). "Moral distress and burnout in internal medicine residents". Can Med Educ J. 8 (1): e36–e43. PMC 5344066. PMID 28344714.
  58. ↑ Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly. 1991. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. HarperCollins Publishers. ISBN 0061876720
  59. ↑ Fang, H., He, B., Fu, H., & Meng, L. (2017). Being eager to prove oneself: U-shaped relationship between competence frustration and intrinsic motivation in another activity. Frontiers in psychology, 8. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02123
  60. ↑ Deci, Edward L., and Richard M. Ryan. "Self-determination theory: When mind mediates behavior." The Journal of Mind and Behavior (1980): 33-43. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43852807
  61. ↑ Reis, H. T., Sheldon, K. M., Gable, S. L., Roscoe, J., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Daily well-being: The role of autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 26(4), 419-435. doi:10.1177/0146167200266002
  62. ↑ Broeck A, Vansteenkiste M, Witte H, Soenens B, Lens W. Capturing autonomy, competence, and relatedness at work: Construction and initial validation of the Work‐related Basic Need Satisfaction scale. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 2010 Dec 1;83(4):981-1002. doi:10.1348/096317909X481382
  63. ↑ Massoud MR, Barry D, Murphy A, Albrecht Y, Sax S, Parchman M (2016). "How do we learn about improving health care: a call for a new epistemological paradigm". Int J Qual Health Care. 28 (3): 420–4. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzw039. PMC 4931911. PMID 27118664.
  64. ↑ Jordon M, Lanham HJ, Anderson RA, McDaniel RR (2010). "Implications of complex adaptive systems theory for interpreting research about health care organizations". J Eval Clin Pract. 16 (1): 228–31. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01359.x. PMC 3667707. PMID 20367840.
  65. ↑ Leykum LK, Pugh J, Lawrence V, Parchman M, Noël PH, Cornell J; et al. (2007). "Organizational interventions employing principles of complexity science have improved outcomes for patients with Type II diabetes". Implement Sci. 2: 28. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-2-28. PMC 2018702. PMID 17725834.
  66. ↑ Leykum LK, Parchman M, Pugh J, Lawrence V, Noël PH, McDaniel RR (2010). "The importance of organizational characteristics for improving outcomes in patients with chronic disease: a systematic review of congestive heart failure". Implement Sci. 5: 66. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-66. PMC 2936445. PMID 20735859.
  67. ↑ Lanham HJ, Leykum LK, Taylor BS, McCannon CJ, Lindberg C, Lester RT (2013). "How complexity science can inform scale-up and spread in health care: understanding the role of self-organization in variation across local contexts". Soc Sci Med. 93: 194–202. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.05.040. PMID 22819737.
  68. ↑ Arar NH, Noel PH, Leykum L, Zeber JE, Romero R, Parchman ML (2011). "Implementing quality improvement in small, autonomous primary care practices: implications for the patient-centred medical home". Qual Prim Care. 19 (5): 289–300. PMC 3313551. PMID 22186171.
  69. ↑ Stephenson MD, Campbell JM, Lisy K, Aromataris EC (2017). "Assessing healthcare professionals' experiences of integrated care: do surveys tell the full story?". Int J Evid Based Healthc. doi:10.1097/XEB.0000000000000116. PMID 28704279.
  70. ↑ Physician Well-Being: The Reciprocity of Practice Efficiency, Culture of Wellness, and Personal Resilience. 2017
  71. ↑ Rigney, Daniel. The Matthew effect: How advantage begets further advantage. Columbia University Press, 2010. ISBN 9780231520409
  72. ↑ Meyers, M. Christina; van Woerkom, Marianne; Bakker, Arnold B. (2013). "The added value of the positive: A literature review of positive psychology interventions in organizations". European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. Informa UK Limited. 22 (5): 618–632. doi:10.1080/1359432x.2012.694689. ISSN 1359-432X.
  73. ↑ Ruhe MC, Bobiak SN, Litaker D, Carter CA, Wu L, Schroeder C; et al. (2011). "Appreciative Inquiry for quality improvement in primary care practices". Qual Manag Health Care. 20 (1): 37–48. doi:10.1097/QMH.0b013e31820311be. PMC 4222905. PMID 21192206.
  74. ↑ Peelle, Henry E. (2006). "Appreciative Inquiry and Creative Problem Solving in Cross-Functional Teams". The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. SAGE Publications. 42 (4): 447–467. doi:10.1177/0021886306292479. ISSN 0021-8863.
  75. ↑ Haldane, Andrew (March 20, 2017). "Productivity puzzles". bankofengland.co.uk. Bank of England. Retrieved 2017-07-16.
  76. ↑ Anonymous. "2016 NHS Staff Survey Results". National Health Service. Retrieved 2017-07-17.
  77. ↑ Fox, Jonathan (2007). "The uncertain relationship between transparency and accountability". Development in Practice. Informa UK Limited. 17 (4–5): 663–671. doi:10.1080/09614520701469955. ISSN 0961-4524.
  78. ↑ Fox, Jonathan A. (2015). "Social Accountability: What Does the Evidence Really Say?". World Development. Elsevier BV. 72: 346–361. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.03.011. ISSN 0305-750X.
  79. ↑ Owen, D. C., Boswell, C., Opton, L., Franco, L., & Meriwether, C. (2018). Engagement, empowerment, and job satisfaction before implementing an academic model of shared governance. Applied Nursing Research. doi:10.1016/j.apnr.2018.02.001
  80. ↑ Anonymous (2024), Organizational decision making (English). Medical Subject Headings. U.S. National Library of Medicine.
  81. ↑ Ross, L., Greene, D., & House, P. (1977). The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13(3), 279–301. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(77)90049-X
  82. ↑ Kristin Behraf J, Peterson Randall S, Mannix Elizabeth A, and William MK. 2008. “The Critical Role of Conflict Resolution in Teams: A Close Look at the Links between Conflict Type, Conflict Management Strategies, and Team Outcomes.” Journal of Applied Psychology 93 (1): 170–88. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.170
  83. ↑ 83.0 83.1 Hunton, James E.; Price, Kenneth H.; Hall, Thomas W. (1996). "A field experiment examining the effects of membership in voting majority and minority subgroups and the ameliorating effects of postdecisional voice". Journal of Applied Psychology. 81 (6): 806–812. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.81.6.806. ISSN 0021-9010.
  84. ↑ Van De Ven, A. H.; Delbecq, A. L. (1974). "The Effectiveness of Nominal, Delphi, and Interacting Group Decision Making Processes". Academy of Management Journal. The Academy of Management. 17 (4): 605–621. doi:10.2307/255641. ISSN 0001-4273.
  85. ↑ Humphrey-Murto S, Varpio L, Wood TJ, Gonsalves C, Ufholz LA, Mascioli K; et al. (2017). "The Use of the Delphi and Other Consensus Group Methods in Medical Education Research: A Review". Acad Med. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000001812. PMID 28678098.
  86. ↑ "Delphi Method". rand.org. RAND Corporation. Retrieved 2017-07-15.
  87. ↑ Fitch, K (2001). "The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User's Manual". rand.org. RAND Corporation. ISBN 0-8330-2918-5. Retrieved 2017-07-15.
  88. ↑ Rideout C, Gil R, Browne R, Calhoon C, Rey M, Gourevitch M; et al. (2013). "Using the Delphi and snow card techniques to build consensus among diverse community and academic stakeholders". Prog Community Health Partnersh. 7 (3): 331–9. doi:10.1353/cpr.2013.0033. PMC 4154599. PMID 24056515.
  89. ↑ Khodyakov D, Grant S, Meeker D, Booth M, Pacheco-Santivanez N, Kim KK (2017). "Comparative analysis of stakeholder experiences with an online approach to prioritizing patient-centered research topics". J Am Med Inform Assoc. 24 (3): 537–543. doi:10.1093/jamia/ocw157. PMID 28011596.
  90. ↑ Khodyakov D, Grant S, Barber CE, Marshall DA, Esdaile JM, Lacaille D (2017). "Acceptability of an online modified Delphi panel approach for developing health services performance measures: results from 3 panels on arthritis research". J Eval Clin Pract. 23 (2): 354–360. doi:10.1111/jep.12623. PMID 27619536.


Template:WikiDoc Sources

Retrieved from "https://www.wikidoc.org/index.php?title=Industrial_and_organizational_psychology&oldid=1505585"