Graft-versus-host disease cost-effectiveness of therapy

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Graft-versus-host disease

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Graft-versus-host disease from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

Chest X Ray

Echocardiograph and Ultrasound

CT

MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Graft-versus-host disease cost-effectiveness of therapy On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Graft-versus-host disease cost-effectiveness of therapy

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Graft-versus-host disease cost-effectiveness of therapy

CDC on Graft-versus-host disease cost-effectiveness of therapy

Graft-versus-host disease cost-effectiveness of therapy in the news

Blogs on Graft-versus-host disease cost-effectiveness of therapy

Directions to Hospitals Treating Type page name here

Risk calculators and risk factors for Graft-versus-host disease cost-effectiveness of therapy

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]

Overview

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Corticosteroids are the most cost-effective therapy for GvHD. Prednisone and methylprednisolone are available at very low cost. Second-line therapies and cell-based therapies are significantly more expensive. If corticosteroids can be used, these should be given first.

References