Glomus tumor historical perspective

Revision as of 16:44, 21 June 2019 by Amandeep Singh (talk | contribs) (→‎Historical Perspective)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Glomus tumor Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Glomus tumor from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

X Ray

Echocardiography and Ultrasound

CT scan

MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Glomus tumor historical perspective On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Glomus tumor historical perspective

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Glomus tumor historical perspective

CDC on Glomus tumor historical perspective

Glomus tumor historical perspective in the news

Blogs on Glomus tumor historical perspective

Directions to Hospitals Treating Glomus tumor

Risk calculators and risk factors for Glomus tumor historical perspective

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Roukoz A. Karam, M.D.[2]

Overview

Glomus body was first discovered by Wood, a Scottish surgeon, in 1812 in the Edinburgh Medical Journal. However, Glomus tumor was first correctly described in 1924 by Barre and Masson.

Historical Perspective

Glomus tumor was first described by Wood, a Scottish surgeon, in 1812 in the Edinburgh Medical Journal.[1][2]

  • However, Wood described it as a small, bluish, benign, subcutaneous nodule associated with severe paroxysmal pain and tenderness.
    • He called this lesion a “painful subcutaneous tubercle.”
  • In 1878, Kolaczek described the subungual location of a painful tubercle, which he believed to be a variant of angiosarcoma.
  • Glomus tumor was first correctly described by Barre and Masson in 1924.[1][2]
    • They correctly interpreted the pathologic anatomy of the painful tubercle.
    • Barre and Masson called it a glomus tumor because of its relationship to the normal neuromyoarterial glomus.

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Garman ME, Orengo IF, Netscher D, Schwartz MR, Rosen T (2003). "On glomus tumors, warts, and razors". Dermatol Surg. 29 (2): 192–4. PMID 12562354.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Tomak Y, Akcay I, Dabak N, Eroglu L (2003). "Subungual glomus tumours of the hand: diagnosis and treatment of 14 cases". Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 37 (2): 121–4. PMID 12755514.