Gastrointestinal perforation natural history

Revision as of 19:33, 1 March 2018 by Medhat (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mohammed Abdelwahed M.D[2]

Gastrointestinal perforation Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating gastrointestinal perforation from other diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

X-Ray

CT

MRI

Echocardiography or Ultrasound

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Gastrointestinal perforation natural history On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Gastrointestinal perforation natural history

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Gastrointestinal perforation natural history

CDC on Gastrointestinal perforation natural history

Gastrointestinal perforation natural history in the news

Blogs on Gastrointestinal perforation natural history

Directions to Hospitals Treating Stomach cancer

Risk calculators and risk factors for Gastrointestinal perforation natural history

Overview

Gastrointestinal perforation natural history

Complications

The incidence of complications ranges from 22 to 29 percent [2,82]. Common postoperative complications include:

Prognosis

  • Prognosis of GIT perforation is related to a delay in initial diagnosis. A delay in diagnosis more than 24 hours in patients found to have isolated blunt small bowel injury was associated with a higher mortality compared with diagnosis at <24 hours. [2].
  • Patients with small bowel injury were significantly more likely to die compared with patients sustaining blunt abdominal trauma who did not have small bowel injury. [2].[8]
  • Mortality rates for patients sustaining a ruptured stomach have been reported between 28 and 66 percent. [1,2,8].
  • Colon-injury-related mortality rate of 1.3 percent. [82].
  • Sepsis has a high mortality rate. Data derived from death certificates report that sepsis is responsible for 6 percent of all deaths while administrative claims data suggest higher rates [74].
  • Mortality rates increase linearly according to the disease severity of sepsis [40].
  • The mortality associated with sepsis was 10 percent while that associated with septic shock was 40 percent [27].
  • Mortality appears to be lower in younger patients (<44 years) without comorbidities. Characteristics that impact the severity of sepsis and, therefore, the outcome include the host's response to infection, the site and type of infection, and the timing and type of antimicrobial therapy. [4]
  • Long-term survival of infants with spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP) has improved over the past 30 years with reported survival rates of 64 to 90 percent, regardless of treatment with primary peritoneal drainage (PPD) or laparotomy [4,5,33,35,40,45].
  • The increase in survival is due to advances in neonatal care including improved parenteral nutrition and antibiotics. Patients with spontaneous intestinal perforation appear to have a lower mortality rate compared with patients with surgically treated necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) or NEC with perforation [46-48].

References