Esophageal web

Graves' disease Microchapters
Home
Patient Information
Overview
Historical Perspective
Pathophysiology
Causes
Differentiating Graves' disease from other Diseases
Epidemiology and Demographics
Risk Factors
Natural History, Complications and Prognosis
Diagnosis
Diagnostic Approach
History and Symptoms
Physical Examination
Laboratory Findings
Electrocardiogram
X Ray
CT
MRI
Echocardiography or Ultrasound
Other Imaging Findings
Other Diagnostic Studies
Treatment
Medical Therapy Hyperthyroidism Ophtalmopathy Dermopathy
Surgery
Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy
Future or Investigational Therapies
Case Studies
Case #1
Esophageal web On the Web
Most recent articles
Most cited articles
Review articles
CME Programs
Powerpoint slides
Images
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Esophageal web All Images X-rays Echo & Ultrasound CT Images MRI
Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov
US National Guidelines Clearinghouse
NICE Guidance
FDA on Esophageal web
CDC on Esophageal web
Esophageal web in the news
Blogs on Esophageal web
Directions to Hospitals Treating Graves' disease
Risk calculators and risk factors for Esophageal web

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1];Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Ahmed Younes M.B.B.CH [2]

Overview

{| class="infobox bordered" style="width: 15em; text-align: left; font-size: 90%; background:AliceBlue"
Esophageal web Main page
Patient Information
Overview
Historical Perspective
Classification
Pathophysiology
Causes
Differentiating Esophageal web from other Diseases
Epidemiology
Risk Factors
Screening
Natural History, Complications and Prognosis
Diagnosis
History and Symptoms
Physical Examination
Laboratory Findings
Radiological tests
Other Diagnostic Studies
Treatment
Medical therapy
Surgerical therapy

|-

|- style="line-height: 1;"

|- ! ICD-10 | Q39.4 |-

|-

|-

|- ! DiseasesDB | 31503 |-

|-

|-

|-

|}

Historical perspective

• In 1944, esophageal webs were first described by Templeton and it was thought to be a congenital disease because most of the patients were children.
• In 1953, a series of case reports of patients having dysphagia and radiological signs denoting esophageal narrowing made the diagnosis of esophageal rings not confined to the pediatric population.
• In 1968, histological examination of specimens from the esophageal rings proved that none of them had muscle involvement.

Classification

Esophageal webs can be classified according to their site and their extent in three categories

Type A

• Type A esophageal rings describe webs that involve the muscle layer of the esophageal wall and lies in close proximity to the squamocolumnar junction.
• It is less common than type B esophageal webs.

Type B

• Type B esophageal rings describe the webs that involve only the mucosa and submucosa of the esophagus.
• It is often named “Schatzki ring”.
• It is located exactly at the squamocolumnar junction.

Type C

• Type C esophageal rings refer to wall invaginations due to pressure from the diaphragm.
• It is rare with no clinical significance.

Pathophysiology

Pathogenesis

There are multiple theories explaining the origin of esophageal webs

Inflammation

• Esophageal webs are thought to be due to the chronic damage to the esophageal mucosa.
• This is supported by the presence of inflammatory cells in the wall of the web.
• In allergic esophagitis, eosinophils were found while in cases of chronic inflammation as GERD, lymphocytes prevailed.

Congenital theory

• Esophageal webs are thought to be due to failure of the esophagus to recanalize.
• Specimens showed that the esophageal webs contained respiratory epithelium supporting this theory.
• The webs mostly remain asymptomatic for long times and that is why it is not correlated with being congenital.

Iron deficiency

• The esophageal webs of Plummer-Vinson syndrome have been associated with iron deficiency anemia in many studies.
• The exact mechanism by which iron deficiency causes esophageal webs is not known, but it was hypothesized that iron deficiency starts a sequence of events in the esophageal epithelium that ends in its damage and formation of a web.
• Moreover, treatment of iron deficiency in Plummer-Vinson syndrome patients leads to resolution of dysphagia even before the laboratory results become normal.

Gross picture

• Esophageal webs appear as an eccentric narrowing of the esophageal lumen (while rings cause circumferential narrowing).

Microscopic picture

• Esophageal webs are covered normally by mucosa and submucosa.
• It is characterized by the presence of basal cell hyperplasia.
• The tissue is often heavily infiltrated with chronic inflammatory cells.
• Eosinophilic esophagitis is characterized by the presence of eosinophils infiltration.

Causes

More common causes

• Iron deficiency anemia
• Plummer-Vinson syndrome
• Celiac sprue
• Zenker’s diverticulum

Less common causes

• Epidermolysis bullosa
• Bullous pemphigoid
• Graft versus host disease
• Pemphigus Vulgaris

Epidemiology

Prevalence

• Webs are diagnosed in 5-15% of patients doing barium esophagogram for diagnosing the cause of dysphagia.
• Congenital esophageal webs are estimated to be 1 in 25,000 to 1 in 50,000 live births.

Race

• Esophageal webs affects the whites more than other population

Sex

• Esophageal webs tend to be more common in females.
• This may be due to the increased prevalence of iron deficiency anemia.

Age

• Esophageal has no predilection for an age group, however, it is usually not symptomatic until after the age of 40.

Screening

According to USPSTF, there are no screening measures recommended for esophageal webs.

Natural history, complications and prognosis

Natural history

• The disease can start at any age but symptoms usually start in the fifth decade of life.
• The dysphagia is usually to solids at the beginning then it progresses to both solids and liquids.
• If left untreated, the webs may progress causing esophageal strictures and esophageal carcinoma.

Prognosis

• The prognosis of esophageal webs is generally good especially with treatment of the underlying cause.
• One of out of ten patients with Plummer-Vinson syndrome will develop esophageal carcinoma.

History and symptoms

History

• Patients are usually older than 40 years because it can be asymptomatic for a long time.
• The patient may give a history of the cause such as iron deficiency anemia, GERD, or autoimmune disease.
• There may be a history of excessive food chewing to facilitate swallowing.

Symptoms

• Most of the esophageal webs are asymptomatic.
• The major symptom of esophageal webs is dysphagia.
• Dysphagia is usually more for solid food.
• Esophageal webs do not usually result in malnutrition nor to weight loss.

Physical examination

Esophageal webs do not have significant physical exam findings, however, it might show the signs of the cause such as

• Koilonychia and glossitis in the cases of Plummer-Vinson syndrome.
• It might also show the findings in in the cases of skin disorders such as epidermolysis bullosa, bullous pemphigoid, and pemphigus vulgaris.

Lab findings

• A Laboratory workup is not necessary for the diagnosis of esophageal webs because the diagnosis is dependent on the symptoms and radiological tests.
• CBC might show microcytic hypochromic anemia in cases of Plummer-Vinson syndrome as it is the primary cause of the esophageal web.
• Antibody panel might be done to screen for the primary cause.

Radiological tests

Barium esophagogram

• It is more sensitive in detecting esophageal webs than endoscopy.
• Webs appear as a uniform narrowing of the esophageal lumen.

Other diagnostic tests

Endoscopy

• Endoscopy is less sensitive in detecting webs than barium esophagram.
• Esophageal webs appear as a smooth membrane that is not encircling the whole lumen.
• It allows obtaining a biopsy from the lesion in addition to excluding other causes of dysphagia.
• Esophageal webs can go unnoticed during the esophagram as it is only a mucous membrane fold with no muscle support.

Treatment

Medical treatment

• Patients should be educated to change their diet and food habits, especially in the cases when esophageal webs are secondary to GERD.
• H2 blockers or proton pump inhibitors can be used for managing the symptoms of GERD and the prevention of progression to webs.
• Proper management of acid reflux after esophageal dilation is associated with decreased recurrence of symptoms.

Surgical treatment

• Esophageal dilation is the cornerstone of treating esophageal webs especially in cases refractory to medical treatment.
• In cases of eosinophilic esophagitis, dilation should be gradual as sudden forced dilation is associated with muscle tears.
• In cases of non-eosinophilic esophagitis, dilation using a single dilator is more effective than graded dilation.
• Esophageal dilation is associated with improved symptoms of dysphagia.
• Esophageal dilation is associated with symptom recurrence in about 89% at five years and often requires redoing of the procedure.