Epidural abscess laboratory findings

Revision as of 20:30, 13 November 2015 by Anthony Gallo (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Epidural abscess Microchapters

Home

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Epidural abscess from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

CT

MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Epidural abscess laboratory findings On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Epidural abscess laboratory findings

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Epidural abscess laboratory findings

CDC on Epidural abscess laboratory findings

Epidural abscess laboratory findings in the news

Blogs on Epidural abscess laboratory findings

Directions to Hospitals Treating Epidural abscess

Risk calculators and risk factors for Epidural abscess laboratory findings

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: João André Alves Silva, M.D. [2]; Anthony Gallo, B.S. [3]

Overview

Laboratory findings consistent with the diagnosis of epidural abscess include [abnormal test 1], [abnormal test 2], and [abnormal test 3].

Laboratory Findings

Laboratory findings consistent with the diagnosis of epidural abscess include [abnormal test 1], [abnormal test 2], and [abnormal test 3].

Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate

An elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate is observed in about 2/3 of patients.[1] This, however, is not always indicative of epidural


C-Reactive Protein

Leukocytosis

Platelet count

Inflammatory markers may be elevated, however this isn't always the case, nor is there a specific marker to confirm the diagnosis. Therefore laboratory results, despite helpful are not diagnostic and should be used alongside clinical findings to help in the diagnosis, nevertheless are still not sufficient, they should then be complemented by imaging studies. [1] Common abnormal markers in this condition are:

Once an abscess has been identified on the imaging studies, it is important to identify the responsible organism, by studying different types of isolated materials, such as blood, material from the abscess and CSF. In the case of material from the abscess, the chance of finding the responsible organism is about 90%, in the blood 62% and in the CSF about 19%. [3]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Darouiche, Rabih O. (2006). "Spinal Epidural Abscess". New England Journal of Medicine. 355 (19): 2012–2020. doi:10.1056/NEJMra055111. ISSN 0028-4793.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Grewal, S. (2006). "Epidural abscesses". British Journal of Anaesthesia. 96 (3): 292–302. doi:10.1093/bja/ael006. ISSN 0007-0912.
  3. Darouiche RO, Hamill RJ, Greenberg SB, Weathers SW, Musher DM (1992). "Bacterial spinal epidural abscess. Review of 43 cases and literature survey". Medicine (Baltimore). 71 (6): 369–85. PMID 1359381.