Boerhaave syndrome surgery: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 43: Line 43:


===Outcomes of surgery===
===Outcomes of surgery===
The following factors affect the outcome of surgery:


==References==
==References==

Revision as of 20:32, 5 February 2018

Boerhaave syndrome Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Boerhaave syndrome from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

Chest X Ray

CT

MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Boerhaave syndrome surgery On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Boerhaave syndrome surgery

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Boerhaave syndrome surgery

CDC on Boerhaave syndrome surgery

Boerhaave syndrome surgery in the news

Blogs on Boerhaave syndrome surgery

Directions to Hospitals Treating Boerhaave syndrome

Risk calculators and risk factors for Boerhaave syndrome surgery

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mohamed Diab, MD [2] Feham Tariq, MD [3]

Overview

Most physicians advice surgical intervention if the diagnosis is made within the first 24 hours after perforation. This can include primary repair of the defect, resection of the defect, diversion, drainage of collections.

Surgery

Objectives of surgical management

The main objectives of surgical management in patients undergoing primary repair are as follows:

  • Debridement of non-viable oesophagus
  • Repair of perforation
  • Drainage of pleural and mediastinal spaces
  • Pleural and mediastinal decontamination
  • Gastric decompression
  • Enteral feeding access

Surgical techniques

The operative procedure opted for the repair of esophagus is influenced by the following factors:

  • General condition of the patient
  • Level of intrathoracic contamination
  • Eligibility of the oesophagus for primary repair

The following surgical techniques are used to perform a repair of a perforation of the esophagus:

  • Devitalized tissue is debrided from the perforation.
  • Longitudinal incision of the muscular layer and along the muscle fibers superior and inferior to the perforation to expose the entire extent of the mucosal injury.
  • The mucosa is closed with absorbable sutures and the muscularis layer is closed with nonabsorbable sutures.

(i) primary repair; (ii) repair over T-tube; (iii) debridement and drainage; and (iv) oesophageal exclusion (cervical oesophagostomy, distal oesophageal transection ± oesophagectomy). Large-bore apical and basal intercostal chest drains were inserted in all patients at the initial operation. A transhiatal drain was inserted in patients undergoing a pure transhiatal approach without thoracotomy.

Video

The following videos demonstrates the step by step procedure of surgical management of boerhaave syndrome.

{{#ev:youtube|GkJnyGvFxU8}}

E-Vac therapy

{{#ev:youtube|ZxWSQPqN734}}

Postoperative management

  • Nutritional support until oral feedings can be initiated and sustained.
  • IV broad spectrum antibiotics typically for 7 to 10 days
  • A contrast esophagram is done on postoperative day seven if the patient is stable.
  • Drains remain in place until the patient is tolerating oral feedings and without evidence of a leak.

Endoscopy

Endoscopic treatment for an esophageal perforation should be considered in patients who are unlikely to tolerate surgery.[1]

Outcomes of surgery

The following factors affect the outcome of surgery:

References

  1. Schweigert M, Beattie R, Solymosi N, Booth K, Dubecz A, Muir A, Moskorz K, Stadlhuber RJ, Ofner D, McGuigan J, Stein HJ (2013). "Endoscopic stent insertion versus primary operative management for spontaneous rupture of the esophagus (Boerhaave syndrome): an international study comparing the outcome". Am Surg. 79 (6): 634–40. PMID 23711276.

Template:WH Template:WS