WBR0329

Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Author [[PageAuthor::Rim Halaby, M.D. [1] (Reviewed by Alison Leibowitz)]]
Exam Type ExamType::USMLE Step 1
Main Category MainCategory::Ethics
Sub Category SubCategory::General Principles
Prompt [[Prompt::An unconscious 67-year-old male, with no advanced directive, is brought to the ER. Following appropriate work-up, you diagnose him with an ischemic stroke. After several days in the hospital, you inform the family that the patient is in a persistent vegetative state supported by machines. The patient has no attorney and has no court-appointed legal guardian. When informed, the patient's family members start to discuss among themselves the possibility of taking the patient off life support. The family members fail to reach a unanimous decision. Which of the following is the most appropriate way to proceed with this patient's case?]]
Answer A AnswerA::The physician in charge must adhere to the decision of the patient's wife
Answer A Explanation AnswerAExp::The patient's wife comes first in priority to be the his health care surrogate.
Answer B AnswerB::The physician in charge must adhere to the decision of the patient's adult children
Answer B Explanation AnswerBExp::The decision of the patient's children are considered when the patient's wife is not present or is not a candidate to make decisions.
Answer C AnswerC::The physician must ask the court of law to decide whether the patient should be off life support or not.
Answer C Explanation AnswerCExp::There is no need to ask the court of law to decide for or against life-sustaining medical interventions.
Answer D AnswerD::The physician must adhere to the decision of the patient's primary care physician.
Answer D Explanation AnswerDExp::Caring physicians of the patient have no role in deciding for or against life-sustaining medical interventions.
Answer E AnswerE::The physician must ask if the patient has any surviving parents whose decision must be adhered to.
Answer E Explanation AnswerEExp::The patient's parents are considered priority only when the patient is a minor.
Right Answer RightAnswer::A
Explanation [[Explanation::When patients with no advance directives are brought in unconscious states and require a surrogate decision-maker for life-sustaining medical interventions, the following order of priority for health care surrogates must be taken into account:

1- Patient's guardian
2- Patient's spouse
3- Patient's adult son or daughter
4- Patient's parent
5- Patient's adult brother or sister
6- Patient's adult grandchild or adult relative who is familiar with the patient and has shown care and concern for the patient
7- Patient's close friend
8- Patient's guardian of the estate

In this scenario, the patient cannot make his own decisions, so the patient's wife is considered his health care surrogate and her decision must be adhered to by the caring physician. The case above does not reveal any reason why the wife would have a disabling condition, mental illness, or conflict of interest that would hinder her from being an appropriate health care surrogate.
Educational Objective: The medical team selects a patient's spouse as health care surrogates for adult patients who do not have any advanced directive.
References: First Aid 2014 page 60]]

Approved Approved::Yes
Keyword WBRKeyword::life-sustaining, WBRKeyword::intervention, WBRKeyword::interventions, WBRKeyword::life support, WBRKeyword::proxy, WBRKeyword::medical, WBRKeyword::stroke, WBRKeyword::ischemic, WBRKeyword::vegetative state, WBRKeyword::ethics
Linked Question Linked::
Order in Linked Questions LinkedOrder::