Hematemesis secondary prevention

Revision as of 22:02, 29 July 2020 by WikiBot (talk | contribs) (Bot: Removing from Primary care)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hematemesis Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Hematemesis from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Chest X Ray

CT

MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Hematemesis secondary prevention On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Hematemesis secondary prevention

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Hematemesis secondary prevention

CDC on Hematemesis secondary prevention

Hematemesis secondary prevention in the news

Blogs on Hematemesis secondary prevention

Directions to Hospitals Treating Hematemesis

Risk calculators and risk factors for Hematemesis secondary prevention

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]

Overview

Secondary Prevention

Prophylaxis Against Bleed From Variceal Hemorrhage and Ulceration

  • Primary prophylaxis against variceal hemorrhage is indicated because of high rate of bleeding from esophageal varices and the high mortality associated with bleeding. Prophylactic propranolol or nadolol therapy is the only cost-effective therapy in this setting.
  • Prophylaxis against stress ulceration maybe also indicated for ICU patients with any of the following characteristics:
  1. Coagulopathy
  2. Mechanical ventilation for more than 2 days
  3. History of GI ulceration or bleeding with the past year
  4. Two or more of the following risk factors — sepsis, ICU admission lasting >1 week, occult GI bleeding lasting ≥6 days, and glucocorticoid therapy.
  • Effective identification and antibiotic treatment of H.Pylori infections is also crutial in preventing complications including upper GI bleeding.
  • In regards to the prevention of NSAID-related peptic ulcer disease and complicating upper GI bleed: patients are at the highest risk for NSAID-induced GI toxicity when they have any of these risk factors:
  1. A history of an ulcer or GI hemorrhage
  2. Age >60
  3. High dosage of a NSAID
  4. Concurrent use of glucocorticoids
  5. Concurrent use of anticoagulants

In these patients, the use of COX-2 selective inhibitor or a nonselective NSAID in combination with a PPI or misoprostol is indicated. In addition, patients with a history of uncomplicated or complicated peptic ulcers should be tested for H. pylori prior to beginning a NSAID or low dose aspirin. If present, H. pylori should be treated with appropriate therapy, even if it is believed that the prior ulcer was due to NSAIDs.

References

Template:WikiDoc Sources