Sandbox:ssw 2
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Manpreet Kaur, MD [2], Sargun Singh Walia M.B.B.S.[3]
Oral Cancer
Oral cancer differential diagnosis The table below outlines the different types of tumors/cancers present in the oral cavity and oropharynx and how they can be differentiated from one another.
Type of cancer | Subtype | ICD-O Code | Epidemiology | Etiology | Localization | Clinical features | Diagnostic procedures |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Squamous cell carcinoma
|
Verrucous carcinoma | 8051/3 |
|
|
|
|
Biopsy shows:
Thickened club-shaped papillae and blunt stromal invaginations of well-differentiated squamous epitheli- um with marked keratinization |
Lymphoepithelial carcinoma | 8082/3 | 0.8-2% of all oral or oropharyngeal cancers | EBV |
|
|
Biopsy chows:
| |
Epithelial precursor lesions | Smoking | Seen in the entire digestive tract |
|
Biopsy shows:
| |||
Proliferative verrucous leukoplakia and precancerous conditions |
|
Unknown |
|
An aggressive form of oral leukoplakia with considerable morbidity and
strong predilection to malignant transformation |
Biopsy shows:
| ||
Papillomas | Squamous cell papilloma and
verruca vulgaris |
|
HPV subtype
2,4,6,7,10,40. |
Any oral site may be affected mostly:
|
lated lesions formed by a cluster of finger-like fronds or a sessile, dome- shaped lesion with a nodular, papillary or verrucous surface |
Biopsy shows:
| |
Condyloma acuminatum | 2nd and 5th decade with a peak in teenagers and young adults |
|
|
|
Biopsy shows:
Several sessile, cauliflower-like swellings forming a cluster | ||
Focal epithelial hyperplasia | Disease of children,adolescents and young adults | HPV
13 and 32 |
|
|
Biopsy shows:
| ||
Granular cell tumour | 9580/0 |
|
No etiological factors are known |
|
|
Biopsy shows:
| |
Keratoacanthoma | 8071/1 |
whites
men as in women |
Associated with uptake of carcinogens(e.g. via particular smoking habits) |
|
|
Biopsy shows:
| |
Papillary hyperplasia | Affects all age groups | Associated with:
|
Palate | Asymptomatic nodular or papillary mucosal lesion | Biopsy shows:
| ||
Median rhomboid glossitis | Associated with chronic candidal infection | Dorsum of the tongue at the junction of the anterior two thirds
and posterior third |
Forms a patch of papillary atrophy in the region of the
embryological foramen caecum |
Biopsy shows:
| |||
Salivary gland tumours | Acinic cell carcinoma | 8550/3 |
|
Unknown |
|
Tumors usually
form non-descript swellings |
Biopsy shows:
|
Mucoepidermoid carcinoma | 8430/3 |
|
Unknown |
|
|
Low power microscopy shows low-grade tumor with both cystic and solid areas and an inflamed, fibrous stroma | |
Adenoid cystic carcinoma | 8200/3 |
|
Unknown |
|
|
Predominantly solid variant shows peri- and intraneural invasion. | |
Epithelial-myoepithelial
carcinoma |
8562/3 | Unknown | |||||
Clear cell carcinoma,
NOS |
8310/3 | Unknown | |||||
Basal cell
adenocarcinoma |
8147/3 | Rare in minor glands | Unknown |
|
Asymptomatic, smooth or lobulated sub-mucosal masses | Microscopically similar to basal
cell adenocarcinomas of the major gland | |
Cystadenocarcinoma | 8450/3 | 32% developed in the minor glands | Unknown |
|
Slow growing and painless but
some palatal tumors may erode the underlying bone causing sinonasal complex. |
||
Salivary duct carcinoma | 8500/3 |
|
Unknown |
|
Tumours formed painless swellings but many in the palate can be painful and ulcerated or fungated with metastases to regional lymph nodes. | The range of
microscopical appearances os similar to that seen in the major glands. | |
Salivary gland adenomas | Pleomorphic adenoma | 8940/0 | 40-70% of minor gland tumors | Unknown |
|
Painless, slow growing, submucosal masses, but when
traumatized may bleed or ulcerate. |
Biopsy shows cellular, and hyaline or plasmacytoid cell |
Myoepithelioma | 8982/0 | 42% of minor gland tumors | Unknown |
|
|||
Basal cell adenoma | 8147/0 | 20% of minor gland tumors | Unknown |
|
They are histologically
similar to those in major glands. | ||
Cystadenoma | 8149/0 | 7% of benign minor gland tumors | Uknown |
|
|||
Kaposi sarcoma |
|
|
|
|
Biopsy of all 4 types show:
| ||
Lymphangioma | 9170/0 |
|
|
Tongue |
|
Biopsy shows:
| |
Ectomesenchymal chondromyxoid
tumour of the anterior tongue |
|
Unknown | Asymptomatic, slow growing solitary nodule in the anterior dorsal tongue | Biopsy shows:
| |||
Focal oral mucinosis (FOM) |
|
Unknown |
|
Asymptomatic fibrous or cystic-like lesion | Histopathology is characterized by:
tissue
| ||
Congenital granular cell epuli |
|
Etiology uncertain |
|
Solitary, somewhat pedunculated fibroma-like lesion attached to the alveolar
ridge near the midline |
| ||
Haematolymphoid tumours | Non-Hodgkin lymphoma | Second most com-
mon cancer of the oral cavity |
|
|
NHL of the lip presents with:
|
Biopsy shows:
| |
Langerhans cell histiocytosis | 9751/1 | Associated with:
|
and
|
Common oral symptoms
include:
|
Biopsy shows ovoid Langerhans cells
with deeply grooved nuclei, thin nuclear membranes and abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm | ||
Hodgkin lymphoma | Strongly associated with Epstein- Barr Virus |
|
Most patients present with localized disease (stage I/II), with
|
||||
Extramedullary myeloid
sarcoma |
9930/3 | History of acute myeloid leukaemia,
predominantly in the monocytic or myelomonocytic subtypes |
|
Isolated tumor-forming intraoral mass | Biopsy shows an Indian-file pattern of infiltration | ||
Follicular dendritic cell
sarcoma / tumour |
9758/3 |
|
History of underlying hya-line-vascular Castleman disease |
|
The patients usually
present with a painless mass |
Biopsy usually exhibits
borders and comprises:
| |
Mucosal malignant melanoma | 8720/3 |
|
No known etiological factors associated with oral melanoma | 80% arise:
gingivae Others:
|
|
|
2017 ACG Guidelines for first-line treatment strategies of peptic ulcer disease for providers in North America
Strong recommendation |
In patients with persistent H. pylori infection, every effort should be made to avoid antibiotics that have been previously taken by the patient. |
The following regimens can be considered for use as salvage treatment:
1.Bismuth quadruple therapy for 14 days is a recommended salvage regimen. 2.Levofloxacin triple regimen for 14 days is a recommended salvage regimen. |
Conditional recommendation |
Bismuth quadruple therapy or levofloxacin salvage regimens are the preferred treatment options if a patient received a first-line treatment containing
clarithromycin. Selection of best salvage regimen should be directed by local antimicrobial resistance data and the patient’s previous exposure to antibiotics. |
Clarithromycin or levofloxacin-containing salvage regimens are the preferred treatment options, if a patient received first-line bismuth quadruple therapy.
Selection of best salvage regimen should be directed by local antimicrobial resistance data and the patient’s previous exposure to antibiotics. |
The following regimens can be considered for use as salvage treatment:
1.Concomitant therapy for 10–14 days is a suggested salvage regimen. 2.Clarithromycin triple therapy should be avoided as a salvage regimen. 3.Rifabutin triple regimen consisting of a PPI, amoxicillin, and rifabutin for 10 days is a suggested salvage regimen. 4.High-dose dual therapy consisting of a PPI and amoxicillin for 14 days is a suggested salvage regimen. |
2017 ACG Guidelines for first-line treatment strategies of peptic ulcer disease for providers in North America
Strong recommendation |
1.Bismuth quadruple therapy consisting of a PPI, bismuth, tetracycline, and a nitroimidazole for 10–14 days is a recommended fi rst-line treatment option.
Bismuth quadruple therapy is particularly attractive in patients with any previous macrolide exposure or who are allergic to penicillin |
2.Concomitant therapy consisting of a PPI, clarithromycin, amoxicillin and a nitroimidazole for 10–14 days is a recommended first-line treatment option |
Conditional recommendation |
1.Patients should be asked about any previous antibiotic exposure(s) and this information should be taken into consideration when choosing an H. pylori
treatment regimen . |
2.Clarithromycin triple therapy consisting of a PPI, clarithromycin, and amoxicillin or metronidazole for 14 days remains a recommended treatment in regions
where H. pylori clarithromycin resistance is known to be <15% and in patients with no previous history of macrolide exposure for any reason. |
3.Sequential therapy consisting of a PPI and amoxicillin for 5–7 days followed by a PPI, clarithromycin, and a nitroimidazole for 5–7 days is a suggested first line
treatment option. |
4.Hybrid therapy consisting of a PPI and amoxicillin for 7 days followed by a PPI, amoxicillin, clarithromycin and a nitroimidazole for 7 days is a suggested
first-line treatment option. |
5.Levofloxacin triple therapy consisting of a PPI, levofloxacin, and amoxicillin for 10–14 days is a suggested first-line treatment option. |
6.Fluoroquinolone sequential therapy consisting of a PPI and amoxicillin for 5–7 days followed by a PPI, fluoroquinolone, and nitroimidazole for 5–7 days is a
suggested first-line treatment option. |
Initial assessment and risk stratification
Strong recommendation |
1. Hemodynamic status should be assessed immediately upon presentation and resuscitative measures begun as needed. |
Conditional recommendation |
1.Blood transfusions should target hemoglobin ≥ 7 g / dl, with higher hemoglobins targeted in patients with clinical evidence of intravascular volume depletion or comorbidities, such as coronary artery disease.
2. Risk assessment should be performed to stratify patients into higher and lower risk categories and may assist in initial decisions such as the timing of endoscopy, time of discharge, and level of care. 3. Discharge from the emergency department without inpatient endoscopy may be considered in patients with urea nitrogen < 18.2 mg / dl; hemoglobin ≥ 13.0 g / dl for men (12.0 g / dl for women), systolic blood pressure ≥ 110 mm Hg; pulse 100 beats / min; and absence of melena, syncope, cardiac failure, and liver disease, as they have <1 % chance of requiring intervention. |
Pre-endoscopic medical therapy
Conditional recommendation |
1. Intravenous infusion of erythromycin (250 mg ~ 30 min before endoscopy) should be considered to improve diagnostic yield and decrease the need for
repeat endoscopy. However, erythromycin has not consistently been shown to improve clinical outcomes |
2. Pre-endoscopic intravenous PPI (e.g., 80 mg bolus followed by 8 mg / h infusion) may be considered to decrease the proportion of patients who have
higher risk stigmata of hemorrhage at endoscopy and who receive endoscopic therapy. However, PPIs do not improve clinical outcomes such as further bleeding, surgery, or death |
3. If endoscopy will be delayed or cannot be performed, intravenous PPI is recommended to reduce further bleeding. |
Gastric lavage
Conditional recommendation |
1. Nasogastric or orogastric lavage is not required in patients with UGIB for diagnosis, prognosis, visualization, or therapeutic effect |
Timing of endoscopy
Conditional recommendation |
Timing of endoscopy
1. Patients with UGIB should generally undergo endoscopy within 24 h of admission, following resuscitative efforts to optimize hemodynamic parameters and other medical problems. |
2. In patients who are hemodynamically stable and without serious comorbidities endoscopy should be performed as soon as possible in a non-emergent
setting to identify the substantial proportion of patients with low-risk endoscopic fi ndings who can be safely discharged. |
3. In patients with higher risk clinical features (e.g., tachycardia, hypotension, bloody emesis or nasogastric aspirate in hospital) endoscopy within 12 h may
be considered to potentially improve clinical outcomes. |
Endoscopic diagnosis
Strong recommendation |
1. Stigmata of recent hemorrhage should be recorded as they predict risk of further bleeding and guide management decisions. The stigmata, in descending
risk of further bleeding, are active spurting, non-bleeding visible vessel, active oozing, adherent clot, fl at pigmented spot, and clean base . |
Endoscopic therapy
Strong recommendation |
1. Endoscopic therapy should be provided to patients with active spurting or oozing bleeding or a non-bleeding visible vessel. |
2. Endoscopic therapy should not be provided to patients who have an ulcer with a clean base or a fl at pigmented spot . |
3. Epinephrine therapy should not be used alone. If used, it should be combined with a second modality. |
4. Thermal therapy with bipolar electrocoagulation or heater probe and injection of sclerosant (e.g., absolute alcohol) are recommended because they
reduce further bleeding, need for surgery, and mortality. |
Conditional recommendation |
1. Endoscopic therapy may be considered for patients with an adherent clot resistant to vigorous irrigation. Benefi t may be greater in patients with clinical features
potentially associated with a higher risk of rebleeding (e.g., older age, concurrent illness, inpatient at time bleeding began). |
2. Clips are recommended because they appear to decrease further bleeding and need for surgery. However, comparisons of clips vs. other therapies yield
variable results and currently used clips have not been well studied . |
3. For the subset of patients with actively bleeding ulcers, thermal therapy or epinephrine plus a second modality may be preferred over clips or sclerosant
alone to achieve initial hemostasis . |
Medical therapy after endoscopy
Strong recommendation |
1. After successful endoscopic hemostasis, intravenous PPI therapy with 80 mg bolus followed by 8 mg/h continuous infusion for 72 h should be given to
patients who have an ulcer with active bleeding, a non-bleeding visible vessel, or an adherent clot. |
2. Patients with ulcers that have fl at pigmented spots or clean bases can receive standard PPI therapy (e.g., oral PPI once daily). |
Repeat endoscopy
Conditional recommendation |
1. Routine second-look endoscopy, in which repeat endoscopy is performed 24 h after initial endoscopic hemostatic therapy, is not recommended. |
2.If further bleeding occurs after a second endoscopic therapeutic session, surgery or interventional radiology with transcathether arterial embolization is
generally employed |
Hospitalization
Conditional recommendation |
1.Patients with high-risk stigmata (active bleeding, visible vessels, clots) should generally be hospitalized for 3 days assuming no rebleeding and no other
reason for hospitalization. They may be fed clear liquids soon after endoscopy. |
Strong recommendation |
1.Patients with clean-based ulcers may receive a regular diet and be discharged after endoscopy assuming they are hemodynamically stable, their hemoglobin
is stable, they have no other medical problems, and they have a residence where they can be observed by a responsible adult. |
Long-term prevention of recurrent bleeding ulcers
Strong recommendation |
1.Patients with H. pylori -associated bleeding ulcers should receive H. pylori therapy. After documentation of eradication, maintenance antisecretory
therapy is not needed unless the patient also requires NSAIDs or antithrombotics. |
2. In patients with NSAID-associated bleeding ulcers, the need for NSAIDs should be carefully assessed and NSAIDs should not be resumed if possible. In
patients who must resume NSAIDs, a COX-2 selective NSAID at the lowest effective dose plus daily PPI is recommended. |
Conditional recommendation |
1.In patients with low-dose aspirin-associated bleeding ulcers, the need for aspirin should be assessed. If given for secondary prevention (i.e., established
cardiovascular disease) then aspirin should be resumed as soon as possible after bleeding ceases in most patients: ideally within 1 – 3 days and certainly within 7 days. Long-term daily PPI therapy should also be provided. If given for primary prevention (i.e., no established cardiovascular disease), anti-platelet therapy likely should not be resumed in most patients. |
2. In patients with idiopathic (non- H. pylori , non-NSAID) ulcers, long-term antiulcer therapy (e.g., daily PPI) is recommended. |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [4]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Manpreet Kaur, MD [5], Sargun Singh Walia M.B.B.S.[6]
2017 ACG Guidelines for first-line treatment strategies of peptic ulcer disease for providers in North America
Strong recommendation |
In patients with persistent H. pylori infection, every effort should be made to avoid antibiotics that have been previously taken by the patient. |
The following regimens can be considered for use as salvage treatment:
1.Bismuth quadruple therapy for 14 days is a recommended salvage regimen. 2.Levofloxacin triple regimen for 14 days is a recommended salvage regimen. |
Conditional recommendation |
Bismuth quadruple therapy or levofloxacin salvage regimens are the preferred treatment options if a patient received a first-line treatment containing
clarithromycin. Selection of best salvage regimen should be directed by local antimicrobial resistance data and the patient’s previous exposure to antibiotics. |
Clarithromycin or levofloxacin-containing salvage regimens are the preferred treatment options, if a patient received first-line bismuth quadruple therapy.
Selection of best salvage regimen should be directed by local antimicrobial resistance data and the patient’s previous exposure to antibiotics. |
The following regimens can be considered for use as salvage treatment:
1.Concomitant therapy for 10–14 days is a suggested salvage regimen. 2.Clarithromycin triple therapy should be avoided as a salvage regimen. 3.Rifabutin triple regimen consisting of a PPI, amoxicillin, and rifabutin for 10 days is a suggested salvage regimen. 4.High-dose dual therapy consisting of a PPI and amoxicillin for 14 days is a suggested salvage regimen. |