Stomach cancer screening

Revision as of 19:02, 14 November 2017 by Medhat (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Parminder Dhingra, M.D. [2]

Stomach cancer Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Stomach Cancer from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic study of choice

Staging

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Endoscopy and Biopsy

Chest X Ray

CT

MRI

Echocardiography or Ultrasound

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Stomach cancer screening On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Stomach cancer screening

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Stomach cancer screening

CDC on Stomach cancer screening

Stomach cancer screening in the news

Blogs on Stomach cancer screening

Directions to Hospitals Treating Stomach cancer

Risk calculators and risk factors for Stomach cancer screening

Overview

Screening cancer

 The two main modalities for gastric cancer screening are upper endoscopy and contrast radiography.

Upper endoscopy

  • Upper endoscopy is more sensitive than other screening studies. It allows direct visualization of the gastric mucosa and obtaining biopsies. [17-21].

Contrast radiography

  • Barium radiographs can identify malignant gastric ulcers, infiltrating lesions, and some early gastric cancers.
  • Barium studies can be false negative in 50 percent of cases. On the other hand, the sensitivity of a barium study may be 14 percent [4] [3]
  • In patients with linitis plastica, barium study may be superior to upper endoscopy.

COMPARISON OF SCREENING METHODS

Test performance 

Gastric cancer detection rates were 2.61 and 0.68 per 1000 screenings, respectively. The sensitivity rates for upper endoscopy versus upper GI series in detecting gastric cancer were 69 and 37 percent, respectively. Both studies had a specificity of 96 percent. The sensitivity of upper endoscopy in detecting a localized gastric cancer was also significantly higher as compared with upper GI series (68 versus 32 percent). In total, 2067 interval cancers occurred within one year of a negative upper GI series and 1083 cancers occurred after a negative upper endoscopy, but there was no difference in interval cancer rates (1.2 per 1000 screenings for both groups).

Effectiveness

There are no data from large randomized trials demonstrating lower gastric cancer-related mortality in screened populations [17,23-30]. In addition, lead time bias, length bias, and selection bias must be considered when appraising the overall effectiveness of screening demonstrated in observational studies. In a retrospective cohort study of 19,168 gastric cancer patients in Korea, endoscopy-screened patients and patients screened with upper GI series were significantly more likely to be diagnosed with localized gastric cancer as compared with never-screened patients (odds ratio 2.1, 95% CI 1.9-2.3 and 1.2, 95% CI 1.1-1.4, respectively) [30]. However, this study did not include data as to which patients were symptomatic or had undergone evaluation outside of the screening program for evaluation of symptoms.

Screening for gastric cancer may be cost-effective for high-risk subgroups, but not low-risk populations [31,32]. A cost-effectiveness analysis found that in a high-risk group of Chinese men ages 50 to 70 years (standardized incidence of gastric cancer of 25.9 per 100,000 population), screening with upper endoscopy every two years was highly cost-effective ($28,836 per quality-adjusted life-years saved [31]). By contrast, averting one gastric cancer death in men in the United States, assuming an incidence of gastric cancer of <10 per 100,000 population, would cost approximately $247,600, which does not compare favorably with other generally accepted cancer screening interventions

SCREENING STRATEGIES

Universal screening

In countries with a high incidence of gastric cancer such as east asia countaries, universal screening is recommended. [17-19]

In Japan, population-based screening for gastric cancer is recommended for individuals older than 50 years with conventional double-contrast barium radiograph with photofluorography every year or upper endoscopy every two to three years [20,33,34].

Screening interval is recommended to be every two years but may be widened to a three-year rather than a two-year interval without significant effect [38-40].

A total of 91 incident cases were found during 19,598,598 person-years of follow-up, and the MST for gastric cancer was 2.4 years (95% CI 1.9-3.0). Of note, the MST was shorter in individuals 40 to 49 years of age (1.3 years, 95% CI 1.0-1.7) than the MST in those 50 to 59 years of age or 60 to 69 (3.2 and 3.7, respectively).  

Selective screening of high-risk subgroups

In areas of low gastric cancer incidence, screening for gastric cancer with upper endoscopy should be reserved for specific high-risk subgroups [41-52].

Individuals at increased risk for gastric cancer include those with the following:

●Gastric adenomas

●Pernicious anemia

●Gastric intestinal metaplasia

●Familial adenomatous polyposis

●Lynch syndrome

●Peutz-Jeghers syndrome

●Juvenile polyposis syndrome

References

Template:WH Template:WS