WBR0281: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
m (refreshing WBR questions)
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WBRQuestion
{{WBRQuestion
|QuestionAuthor={{AO}}
|QuestionAuthor= {{AO}} (Reviewed by  {{YD}} and Serge Korjian)
|ExamType=USMLE Step 1
|ExamType=USMLE Step 1
|MainCategory=Ethics
|MainCategory=Ethics
|SubCategory=General Principles
|MainCategory=Ethics
|MainCategory=Ethics
|SubCategory=General Principles
|MainCategory=Ethics
|MainCategory=Ethics
|SubCategory=General Principles
|MainCategory=Ethics
|MainCategory=Ethics
|MainCategory=Ethics
|MainCategory=Ethics
|MainCategory=Ethics
|MainCategory=Ethics
|SubCategory=General Principles
|MainCategory=Ethics
|MainCategory=Ethics
|SubCategory=General Principles
|MainCategory=Ethics
|MainCategory=Ethics
|SubCategory=General Principles
|MainCategory=Ethics
|MainCategory=Ethics
|SubCategory=General Principles
|MainCategory=Ethics
|MainCategory=Ethics
|Prompt=A 67-year-old post-menopausal Japanese woman (Gravida 2, Para 2) presents to the ER with a 4-month history of a gradually progressing abdominal distension, fatigue and a 5kg weight loss.  She had a medical history of vaginal hysterectomy because of a uterine prolapse after menopause at the age of 58. On examination she appears malnourished, pale, pupils are round and reactive with scleral icterus.  Lungs are clear. Cardiac examination demonstrates a normal S1 and S2 with a 2/6 systolic murmur at the left sternal border.  Abdomen is distended with a positive fluid thrill. Laboratory studies shows her level of serum cancer-related antigen 125 (CA125) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) were 170.0U/mL (normal range is 0 to 35U/mL) and 15.1U/mL (normal range is 0 to 37U/mL) respectively.  She was diagnosed of stage IV ovarian cancer following initial staging and a debulking operation. She refused chemotherapy and the physician agrees to follow her wishes. This is an example of which ethical principle?
|MainCategory=Ethics
|Explanation=Medical ethics is a system of moral principles that apply values and judgments to the practice of medicine. There are four basic principles which form the bedrock of the medical profession: autonomy, beneficence, justice, and nonmaleficence.
|SubCategory=General Principles
|AnswerA=Authority
|Prompt=A 67-year-old woman presents to the physician's office with complaints of gradually progressing abdominal distension, fatigue, and a 7-kg weight loss over the past 3 monthsHer past medical history is significant for well-controlled hypertension and dyslipidemia. On physical examination, the abdomen is markedly distended with a positive fluid wave. Mild abdominal tenderness is noted over the left lower quadrant on soft palpation along with a large firm lower abdominal mass most evident on deep palpation. Laboratory studies reveal elevated levels of carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA-125). Following a thorough work-up, the patient is diagnosed with stage IV ovarian cancer. After educating the patient about her condition and discussing her concerns, the physician offers her a course of palliative chemotherapy. The patient explains that she understands the risks but prefers to live out the remainder of her life without undergoing chemotherapy. The physician agrees to follow her wishes. Which principle of medical ethics does this interaction exemplify?
|AnswerAExp=Incorrect.  Authority – By definition, this means the right or means to command or control others.  This is not an ethical principle in medical practice.
|Explanation=Medical ethics are a set of principles that define the ethical practice of modern medicine. There are 4 major principles of medical ethics:<br>
|AnswerB=Autonomy
# Beneficence<br>
|AnswerBExp=Correct. This principle means that an informed, competent adult patient can refuse or accept treatments, drugs, and surgeries according to their wishes.  These decisions must be respected by everyone, even if those decisions are not in the best interest of the patient.
# Non-maleficence<br>
# Respect for autonomy<br>
# Justice
<br>
'''Beneficence:'''<br>
Physicians must always define the benefit to risk ratio when considering treatment options for patients. All physicians are obligated to provide net benefit to their patients.
<br><br>
'''Non-Maleficence:'''<br>
Physicians are obligated to do no harm to patients. Similar to the principle of beneficence, all management approaches must have the patient's interest first with no intention to harm. The principles of beneficence and non-maleficence are most pronounced in medical research and population medicine, where clear benefit and harm may not be as evident because the true beneficiary may not be the research subject himself.
<br><br>
'''Respect for Autonomy:'''<br>
Physicians must ensure that the priority of all their decisions is the patient's interest. Adult patients (> 18 years according to US law) who are deemed able to make their own decisions have the right to refuse treatment, regardless of how significant or trivial it may be for their health. A physician's respect for a patient's autonomy, or self-rule, requires that the physician communicates with the patient, discusses all concerns, and answers questions in an evidence-based manner.
<br><br>
'''Justice:'''<br>
Justice refers to the set of principles that dictate the ethics of medicine at a population-based scale. All physicians should act on the basis of fair allocation of resources and adjudication between competing claims. Patients should have the right to have equal access to healthcare. Although healthcare resources are limited, physicians must distribute these resources to efficiently meet the needs of those who require them the most.
|AnswerA=Respect for authority
|AnswerAExp=Respect for authority is not an ethical principle of medicine. Respect of authority refers to a person's abiding by the rules set by authorities. A citizen who abides by the laws set by the government or a child who abides by the rules set by his parents are 2 examples of respect for authority.
|AnswerB=Respect for autonomy
|AnswerBExp=Respect for autonomy is a principle of medical ethics. Before initiation with chemotherapy for this patient, the physician is required to educate the patient about her condition and obtain an informed consent. A physician's respect for a patient's autonomy, or self-rule, requires that the physician communicates with the patient, discusses all concerns, and answers questions in an evidence-based manner. Adult patients (> 18 years according to US law) who are deemed able to make their own decisions have the right to refuse to be treated, regardless of how significant or trivial the treatment may be for their health.
|AnswerC=Beneficence
|AnswerC=Beneficence
|AnswerCExp=Incorrect.  All healthcare professionals must strive to improve their patient’s health, to do the most good for the patient in every situation.  Ultimately, the patient has to make an informed decision.
|AnswerCExp=Beneficence is a principle of medical ethics that refers to a physician's obligations to weigh the risks and benefits of any treatment and choose only those whose benefits exceed their risks.
|AnswerD=Justice
|AnswerD=Justice
|AnswerDExp=Incorrect.  This principle demands that all healthcare providers should try to be as fair as possible when offering treatments to patients.  You should be able to justify your actions in every situation.
|AnswerDExp=Justice is a principle of medical ethics that refers mostly to large-scale population medicine whereby physicians must allocate resources and healthcare access fairly among patients based on patient needs.
|AnswerE=Nonmaleficence
|AnswerE=Non-maleficence
|AnswerEExp=Incorrect.  This means “do no harm.”  This means that healthcare professionals have a duty to protect patients from harm. However, when the benefit of a treatment outweighs the risk, the patient has to make an informed decision in order to proceed with the treatment.
|AnswerEExp=Non-maleficence is a principle of medical ethics that refers to a physician's obligation to do no harm.
|EducationalObjectives=Respect for autonomy is a principle of medical ethics. A physician's respect to a patient's autonomy, or self-rule, requires that the physician communicates with the patient, discusses all concerns, and answers questions in an evidence-based manner. Adult patients (> 18 years according to US law) who are deemed able to make their own decisions have the right to refuse to be treated, regardless of how significant or trivial the treatment may be for their health.
|References=Gillon R. Medical ethics: four principles plus attention to scope. BMJ. 1994;309:184.<br>Luce JM, White DB. A history of ethics and law in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Clin. 2009.25(1):221-237.<br>First Aid 2014 page 59
|RightAnswer=B
|RightAnswer=B
|WBRKeyword=Principles of medical ethics, Principles, Medical ethics, Autonomy, Nonmaleficence, Beneficence, Justice, Ethics, Non-maleficence, Respect, Chemotherapy
|Approved=Yes
|Approved=Yes
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 00:02, 28 October 2020

 
Author [[PageAuthor::Ayokunle Olubaniyi, M.B,B.S [1] (Reviewed by Yazan Daaboul, M.D. and Serge Korjian)]]
Exam Type ExamType::USMLE Step 1
Main Category MainCategory::Ethics
Sub Category SubCategory::General Principles
Prompt [[Prompt::A 67-year-old woman presents to the physician's office with complaints of gradually progressing abdominal distension, fatigue, and a 7-kg weight loss over the past 3 months. Her past medical history is significant for well-controlled hypertension and dyslipidemia. On physical examination, the abdomen is markedly distended with a positive fluid wave. Mild abdominal tenderness is noted over the left lower quadrant on soft palpation along with a large firm lower abdominal mass most evident on deep palpation. Laboratory studies reveal elevated levels of carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA-125). Following a thorough work-up, the patient is diagnosed with stage IV ovarian cancer. After educating the patient about her condition and discussing her concerns, the physician offers her a course of palliative chemotherapy. The patient explains that she understands the risks but prefers to live out the remainder of her life without undergoing chemotherapy. The physician agrees to follow her wishes. Which principle of medical ethics does this interaction exemplify?]]
Answer A AnswerA::Respect for authority
Answer A Explanation [[AnswerAExp::Respect for authority is not an ethical principle of medicine. Respect of authority refers to a person's abiding by the rules set by authorities. A citizen who abides by the laws set by the government or a child who abides by the rules set by his parents are 2 examples of respect for authority.]]
Answer B AnswerB::Respect for autonomy
Answer B Explanation [[AnswerBExp::Respect for autonomy is a principle of medical ethics. Before initiation with chemotherapy for this patient, the physician is required to educate the patient about her condition and obtain an informed consent. A physician's respect for a patient's autonomy, or self-rule, requires that the physician communicates with the patient, discusses all concerns, and answers questions in an evidence-based manner. Adult patients (> 18 years according to US law) who are deemed able to make their own decisions have the right to refuse to be treated, regardless of how significant or trivial the treatment may be for their health.]]
Answer C AnswerC::Beneficence
Answer C Explanation AnswerCExp::Beneficence is a principle of medical ethics that refers to a physician's obligations to weigh the risks and benefits of any treatment and choose only those whose benefits exceed their risks.
Answer D AnswerD::Justice
Answer D Explanation AnswerDExp::Justice is a principle of medical ethics that refers mostly to large-scale population medicine whereby physicians must allocate resources and healthcare access fairly among patients based on patient needs.
Answer E AnswerE::Non-maleficence
Answer E Explanation AnswerEExp::Non-maleficence is a principle of medical ethics that refers to a physician's obligation to do no harm.
Right Answer RightAnswer::B
Explanation [[Explanation::Medical ethics are a set of principles that define the ethical practice of modern medicine. There are 4 major principles of medical ethics:
  1. Beneficence
  2. Non-maleficence
  3. Respect for autonomy
  4. Justice


Beneficence:
Physicians must always define the benefit to risk ratio when considering treatment options for patients. All physicians are obligated to provide net benefit to their patients.

Non-Maleficence:
Physicians are obligated to do no harm to patients. Similar to the principle of beneficence, all management approaches must have the patient's interest first with no intention to harm. The principles of beneficence and non-maleficence are most pronounced in medical research and population medicine, where clear benefit and harm may not be as evident because the true beneficiary may not be the research subject himself.

Respect for Autonomy:
Physicians must ensure that the priority of all their decisions is the patient's interest. Adult patients (> 18 years according to US law) who are deemed able to make their own decisions have the right to refuse treatment, regardless of how significant or trivial it may be for their health. A physician's respect for a patient's autonomy, or self-rule, requires that the physician communicates with the patient, discusses all concerns, and answers questions in an evidence-based manner.

Justice:
Justice refers to the set of principles that dictate the ethics of medicine at a population-based scale. All physicians should act on the basis of fair allocation of resources and adjudication between competing claims. Patients should have the right to have equal access to healthcare. Although healthcare resources are limited, physicians must distribute these resources to efficiently meet the needs of those who require them the most.
Educational Objective: Respect for autonomy is a principle of medical ethics. A physician's respect to a patient's autonomy, or self-rule, requires that the physician communicates with the patient, discusses all concerns, and answers questions in an evidence-based manner. Adult patients (> 18 years according to US law) who are deemed able to make their own decisions have the right to refuse to be treated, regardless of how significant or trivial the treatment may be for their health.
References: Gillon R. Medical ethics: four principles plus attention to scope. BMJ. 1994;309:184.
Luce JM, White DB. A history of ethics and law in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Clin. 2009.25(1):221-237.
First Aid 2014 page 59]]

Approved Approved::Yes
Keyword WBRKeyword::Principles of medical ethics, WBRKeyword::Principles, WBRKeyword::Medical ethics, WBRKeyword::Autonomy, WBRKeyword::Nonmaleficence, WBRKeyword::Beneficence, WBRKeyword::Justice, WBRKeyword::Ethics, WBRKeyword::Non-maleficence, WBRKeyword::Respect, WBRKeyword::Chemotherapy
Linked Question Linked::
Order in Linked Questions LinkedOrder::