Subgroup analysis: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Subgroup analysis''', in the context of [[Design of experiments|design]] and analysis of experiments, refers to looking for pattern in a subset of the subjects<ref name="lagakos06">{{
'''Subgroup analysis''', in the context of [[Design of experiments|design]] and analysis of experiments, refers to looking for pattern in a subset of the subjects<ref name="lagakos06">{{ cite journal |url=http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/extract/354/16/1667 |author=Lagakos SW |journal=[[NEJM]] |title=The challenge of subgroup analyses--reporting without distorting |year = 2006 |month = April 20 |volume = 354 |issue = 16 |pages = 1667-9 |id = PMID 16625007 }}</ref>.
cite journal
 
|url=http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/extract/354/16/1667
Proposed best practice is to use adjust subgroup comparisons with multivariable risk prediction<ref name="pmid16613605">{{cite journal| author=Hayward RA, Kent DM, Vijan S, Hofer TP| title=Multivariable risk prediction can greatly enhance the statistical power of clinical trial subgroup analysis. | journal=BMC Med Res Methodol | year= 2006 | volume= 6 | issue=  | pages= 18 | pmid=16613605 | doi=10.1186/1471-2288-6-18 | pmc=1523355 | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=16613605  }} </ref>; however, this is not commonly done<ref name="pmid27423688">{{cite journal| author=Gabler NB, Duan N, Raneses E, Suttner L, Ciarametaro M, Cooney E | display-authors=etal| title=No improvement in the reporting of clinical trial subgroup effects in high-impact general medical journals. | journal=Trials | year= 2016 | volume= 17 | issue= 1 | pages= 320 | pmid=27423688 | doi=10.1186/s13063-016-1447-5 | pmc=4947338 | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=27423688  }} </ref>.
|author=Lagakos SW
|journal=[[NEJM]]
|title=The challenge of subgroup analyses--reporting without distorting
|year = 2006
|month = April 20
|volume = 354
|issue = 16
|pages = 1667-9
|id = PMID 16625007
}}</ref>.


Slide set: [[File:Subgroup and Interaction Analysis.pdf]]
Slide set: [[File:Subgroup and Interaction Analysis.pdf]]
== See also ==
== See also ==
*[[Post-hoc analysis]]
*[[Post-hoc analysis]]

Revision as of 18:33, 20 May 2020

Subgroup analysis, in the context of design and analysis of experiments, refers to looking for pattern in a subset of the subjects[1].

Proposed best practice is to use adjust subgroup comparisons with multivariable risk prediction[2]; however, this is not commonly done[3].

Slide set: File:Subgroup and Interaction Analysis.pdf

See also

References

  1. Lagakos SW (2006). "The challenge of subgroup analyses--reporting without distorting". NEJM. 354 (16): 1667–9. PMID 16625007. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  2. Hayward RA, Kent DM, Vijan S, Hofer TP (2006). "Multivariable risk prediction can greatly enhance the statistical power of clinical trial subgroup analysis". BMC Med Res Methodol. 6: 18. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-6-18. PMC 1523355. PMID 16613605.
  3. Gabler NB, Duan N, Raneses E, Suttner L, Ciarametaro M, Cooney E; et al. (2016). "No improvement in the reporting of clinical trial subgroup effects in high-impact general medical journals". Trials. 17 (1): 320. doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1447-5. PMC 4947338. PMID 27423688.