Sjögren's syndrome classification

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Sjögren's syndrome Microchapters

Home

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Sjögren's syndrome from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

X Ray

Echocardiography and Ultrasound

CT

MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Sjögren's syndrome classification On the Web

Most recent articles

cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Sjögren's syndrome classification

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Sjögren's syndrome classification

CDC on Sjögren's syndrome classification

Sjögren's syndrome classification in the news

Blogs on Sjögren's syndrome classification

Directions to Hospitals Treating Sjögren's syndrome

Risk calculators and risk factors for Sjögren's syndrome classification

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]

Overview

Classification

  • There is no established system for the classification of [disease name].

OR

  • [Disease name] may be classified according to [classification method] into [number] subtypes/groups:
    • [Group1]
    • [Group2]
    • [Group3]
    • [Group4]

OR

  • [Disease name] may be classified into [large number > 6] subtypes based on:
    • [Classification method 1]
    • [Classification method 2]
    • [Classification method 3]
  • [Disease name] may be classified into several subtypes based on:
    • [Classification method 1]
    • [Classification method 2]
    • [Classification method 3]

OR

  • Based on the duration of symptoms, [disease name] may be classified as either acute or chronic.

OR

  • If the staging system involves specific and characteristic findings and features:
  • According to the [staging system + reference], there are [number] stages of [malignancy name] based on the [finding1], [finding2], and [finding3]. Each stage is assigned a [letter/number1] and a [letter/number2] that designate the [feature1] and [feature2].

OR

  • The staging of [malignancy name] is based on the [staging system].

OR

  • There is no established system for the staging of [malignancy name].


I. Ocular symptoms: a positive response to at least one of the following questions: 1. Have you had daily, persistent, troublesome dry eyes for more than 3 months? 2. Do you have a recurrent sensation of sand or gravel in the eyes? 3. Do you use tear substitutes more than 3 times a day? II. Oral symptoms: a positive response to at least one of the following questions: 1. Have you had a daily feeling of dry mouth for more than 3 months? 2. Have you had recurrently or persistently swollen salivary glands as an adult? 3. Do you frequently drink liquids to aid in swallowing dry food? III. Ocular signs-that is, objective evidence of ocular involvement defined as a positive result for at least one of the following two tests: 1. Schirmer's test, performed without anaesthesia (≤5 mm in 5 minutes) 2. Rose bengal score or other ocular dye score (≥4 according to van Bijsterveld's scoring system) IV. Histopathology: In minor salivary glands (obtained through normal-appearing mucosa) focal lymphocytic sialoadenitis, evaluated by an expert histopathologist, with a focus score ≥1, defined as a number of lymphocytic foci (which are adjacent to normal-appearing mucous acini and contain more than 50 lymphocytes) per 4 square mm of glandular tissue V. Salivary gland involvement: objective evidence of salivary gland involvement defined by a positive result for at least one of the following diagnostic tests: 1. Unstimulated whole salivary flow (≤1.5 ml in 15 min) 2. Parotid sialography showing the presence of diffuse sialectasias (punctate, cavitary or destructive pattern), without evidence of obstruction in the major ducts 3. Salivary scintigraphy showing delayed uptake, reduced concentration and/or delayed excretion of tracer VI. Autoantibodies: presence in the serum of the following autoantibodies: 1. Antibodies to Ro(SSA) or La(SSB) antigens, or both

References

Template:WH Template:WS