Rheumatic fever secondary prevention

Revision as of 13:54, 3 October 2011 by Varun Kumar (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Rheumatic fever Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Rheumatic Fever from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

Jones Criteria

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

X-ray

Echocardiography and Ultrasound

CT scan

MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Case Studies

Case #1

Rheumatic fever secondary prevention On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Rheumatic fever secondary prevention

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Rheumatic fever secondary prevention

CDC on Rheumatic fever secondary prevention

Rheumatic fever secondary prevention in the news

Blogs on Rheumatic fever secondary prevention

Directions to Hospitals Treating Rheumatic fever

Risk calculators and risk factors for Rheumatic fever secondary prevention

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Lance Christiansen, D.O.; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Varun Kumar, M.B.B.S. [2]; Cafer Zorkun, M.D., Ph.D. [3]

Overview

In order to prevent recurrent development of rheumatic fever, an antibiotic prophylaxis should be initiated immediately after the antibiotic course in treatment of rheumatic fever. Duration of prophylactic treatment varies with degree of cardiac damage secondary to rheumatic fever.

Secondary Prevention

If an individual does not contract a Streptococcus pyogenes infection for a long period, perhaps for five years or longer, an individual's immunological/autoimmunological responsivness will naturally decrease and, perhaps, there will be less chance of developing rheumatic fever if the individual contracts a future Streptococcus pyogenes infection.

Prophylactic antibiotic therapy should be initiated immediately after the therapeutic antibiotic course. If the patient or their household contacts develop streptococcal pharyngitis during the prophylactic period, they should be evaluated and treated promptly.

Providing prophylactic therapy to individuals who have had rheumatic fever with monthly (or maybe every three weeks) injections of Benzathine Penicillin G, 1,200,000 units, or oral penicillin V or G, 250mg twice daily (I think 500 mg twice daily is more efficacious), decreases the frequency of recurrent Streptococcus pyogenes infections and therefore recurrent rheumatic fever episodes. It is estimated that the recurrence rate of rheumatic fever is decreased about 85% by providing prophylactic penicillin therapy.

Secondary Prevention of Rheumatic Fever[1][2]
Agent Dosage Mode Rating
Benzathine penicillin G 1,200,000 Units every 4 weeks (every 3 weeks for high-risk patients such as those with residual carditis) Intramuscular Class I, LOE A
or
Penicillin V 250 mg twice daily Oral Class I, LOE B
or
Sulfadiazine 0.5 g once daily for patients ≤ 27 kg (60 lb); 1.0 g once daily for patients > 27 kg (60 lb) Oral Class I, LOE B
or
Erythromycin among patients with penicillin allergy 250 mg twice daily Oral Class I, LOE C


Duration of Secondary Rheumatic Fever Prophylaxis[1][2]
Category Duration Rating
Rheumatic fever with carditis and residual heart disease (persistent valvular disease) ≥ 10 years since last episode and at least until age 40 years; sometimes lifelong prophylaxis in high risk patients Class I, LOE C
Rheumatic fever with carditis but no residual heart disease (no valvular disease) 10 years or well into adulthood, whichever is longer Class I, LOE C
Rheumatic fever without carditis 5 years or until age 21 years, whichever is longer Class I, LOE C

Recurrence of rheumatic fever is higher among patients receiving oral prophylaxis than those receiving intramuscular benzathine penicillin G. This may be attributed to patient compliance i.e. patients prefer injection once in 4weeks over taking medicines daily. This observation was made in a study involving 405 children and adolescents with rheumatic fever assigned to receive 4 weeks of intramuscular benzathine penicillin G, oral penicillin G or oral sulfadiazine. Recurrence of rheumatic fever was observed in 0%, 4.8%, and 2.7% of the patients, respectively[3]. Therefore parenteral prophylaxis is recommended over oral prophylaxis

Sources

2008 Focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons.[1]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K, de Leon AC, Faxon DP, Freed MD; et al. (2008). "2008 Focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons". Circulation. 118 (15): e523–661. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.190748. PMID 18820172.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Gerber MA, Baltimore RS, Eaton CB, Gewitz M, Rowley AH, Shulman ST; et al. (2009). "Prevention of rheumatic fever and diagnosis and treatment of acute Streptococcal pharyngitis: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis, and Kawasaki Disease Committee of the Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, the Interdisciplinary Council on Functional Genomics and Translational Biology, and the Interdisciplinary Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research: endorsed by the American Academy of Pediatrics". Circulation. 119 (11): 1541–51. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.191959. PMID 19246689.
  3. FEINSTEIN AR, WOOD HF, EPSTEIN JA, TARANTA A, SIMPSON R, TURSKY E (1959). "A controlled study of three methods of prophylaxis against streptococcal infection in a population of rheumatic children. II. Results of the first three years of the study, including methods for evaluating the maintenance of oral prophylaxis". N Engl J Med. 260 (14): 697–702. doi:10.1056/NEJM195904022601405. PMID 13644570.

Template:WH Template:WS