Pulseless electrical activity historical perspective: Difference between revisions
Mahmoud Sakr (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|} | |} | ||
{{Pulseless electrical activity}} | {{Pulseless electrical activity}} | ||
==Overview== | |||
==Historical Perspective== | |||
The first approach against trying to decrease mortality due to SCA, was to target tachyarrhythmias, especially ventricular fibrillation (VF) and ventricular tachycardia (VT). This was mainly achieved by the improvements in CPR techniques, the availability of defibrillators to lay responders and the use of implantable cardioverter- defibrillators. Nevertheless, there is and increase in prevalence of PEA and asystolia, which makes them now more frequent than VT and VF. There is still not clear if this can be due to a proportional increase, rather than an absolute increase in cases of PEA. Studies suggest that there is a need to change this approach, because of the increased proportion of PEA cases, and mainly because of the better outcome of survival in PEA patients, than those with VF/VT <ref name="pmid21060069">{{cite journal| author=Teodorescu C, Reinier K, Dervan C, Uy-Evanado A, Samara M, Mariani R et al.| title=Factors associated with pulseless electric activity versus ventricular fibrillation: the Oregon sudden unexpected death study. | journal=Circulation | year= 2010 | volume= 122 | issue= 21 | pages= 2116-22 | pmid=21060069 | doi=10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.966333 | pmc= | url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=21060069 }} </ref> <ref name="pmid24297818">{{cite journal| author=Myerburg RJ, Halperin H, Egan DA, Boineau R, Chugh SS, Gillis AM et al.| title=Pulseless electric activity: definition, causes, mechanisms, management, and research priorities for the next decade: report from a national heart, lung, and blood institute workshop. | journal=Circulation | year= 2013 | volume= 128 | issue= 23 | pages= 2532-41 | pmid=24297818 | doi=10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.004490 | pmc= | url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=24297818 }} </ref>. Deeper studies will achieve ultimately a better therapeutic strategy, leading to better patient outcomes and a subsequent impact in overall mortality due to SCA. | |||
There was a workshop created by Myerburg from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute <ref name="pmid24297818">{{cite journal| author=Myerburg RJ, Halperin H, Egan DA, Boineau R, Chugh SS, Gillis AM et al.| title=Pulseless electric activity: definition, causes, mechanisms, management, and research priorities for the next decade: report from a national heart, lung, and blood institute workshop. | journal=Circulation | year= 2013 | volume= 128 | issue= 23 | pages= 2532-41 | pmid=24297818 | doi=10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.004490 | pmc= | url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=24297818 }} </ref> as an attempt to record the current knowledge and direct the future research in the field. This workshop also described some of the pathophysiology of PEA, which may translate to improved clinical care. | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist|2}} | {{reflist|2}} | ||
Revision as of 15:53, 12 December 2013
 |
Resident Survival Guide |
|
Pulseless electrical activity Microchapters |
|
Differentiating Pulseless Electrical Activity from other Diseases |
|---|
|
Diagnosis |
|
Treatment |
|
Case Studies |
|
Pulseless electrical activity historical perspective On the Web |
|
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Pulseless electrical activity historical perspective |
|
Pulseless electrical activity historical perspective in the news |
|
Blogs on Pulseless electrical activity historical perspective |
|
Directions to Hospitals Treating Pulseless electrical activity |
|
Risk calculators and risk factors for Pulseless electrical activity historical perspective |
Overview
Historical Perspective
The first approach against trying to decrease mortality due to SCA, was to target tachyarrhythmias, especially ventricular fibrillation (VF) and ventricular tachycardia (VT). This was mainly achieved by the improvements in CPR techniques, the availability of defibrillators to lay responders and the use of implantable cardioverter- defibrillators. Nevertheless, there is and increase in prevalence of PEA and asystolia, which makes them now more frequent than VT and VF. There is still not clear if this can be due to a proportional increase, rather than an absolute increase in cases of PEA. Studies suggest that there is a need to change this approach, because of the increased proportion of PEA cases, and mainly because of the better outcome of survival in PEA patients, than those with VF/VT [1] [2]. Deeper studies will achieve ultimately a better therapeutic strategy, leading to better patient outcomes and a subsequent impact in overall mortality due to SCA.
There was a workshop created by Myerburg from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [2] as an attempt to record the current knowledge and direct the future research in the field. This workshop also described some of the pathophysiology of PEA, which may translate to improved clinical care.
References
- ↑ Teodorescu C, Reinier K, Dervan C, Uy-Evanado A, Samara M, Mariani R; et al. (2010). "Factors associated with pulseless electric activity versus ventricular fibrillation: the Oregon sudden unexpected death study". Circulation. 122 (21): 2116–22. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.966333. PMID 21060069.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Myerburg RJ, Halperin H, Egan DA, Boineau R, Chugh SS, Gillis AM; et al. (2013). "Pulseless electric activity: definition, causes, mechanisms, management, and research priorities for the next decade: report from a national heart, lung, and blood institute workshop". Circulation. 128 (23): 2532–41. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.004490. PMID 24297818.