Palmar plantar erythrodysesthesia overview

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Palmar plantar erythrodysesthesia Microchapters

Home

Overview

Historical perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Palmar plantar erythrodysesthesia from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural history, Complications, and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

X-ray

Echocardiography and Ultrasound

CT scan

MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Palmar plantar erythrodysesthesia overview On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Palmar plantar erythrodysesthesia overview

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Palmar plantar erythrodysesthesia overview

CDC on Palmar plantar erythrodysesthesia overview

Palmar plantar erythrodysesthesia overview in the news

Blogs on Palmar plantar erythrodysesthesia overview

Directions to Hospitals Treating Palmar plantar erythrodysesthesia

Risk calculators and risk factors for Palmar plantar erythrodysesthesia overview

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief:

Overview

Historical Perspective

In 1974, Zuehlke was the first to describe PPE in a patient receiving mitotane for hypernephroma.

Classification

A number of different classifications have been used for grading the severity of Palmar plantar erythrodysesthesia. The classifications suggested by the National Cancer Institute (NCI), and the World Health Organization are the two most commonly used.

Pathophysiology

The exact pathogenesis of palmar plantar erythrodysesthesia is not completely understood. It is thought that PPE is caused by direct toxic effect of the chemotherapeutic drugs against keratinocytes, excretion of the drugs in eccrine sweat glands, or type I allergic reaction. Unique characteristics of the palms and soles that justify their involvement in PPE. The pathological features of PPE are non-specific. However, since PPE involves a cytotoxic reaction primarily affecting keratinocytes the histopathologic findings are similar to histologic manifestation of direct toxic reactions.

Causes

Several different Chemotherapeutic agents have been associated with PPE. Most frequently associated drugs include cytarabine, docetaxel, doxorubicin, liposomal-encapsulated doxorubicin, 5-fluorouracil, and capecitabine.

Differentiating Palmar plantar erythrodysesthesia from Other Diseases

PPE must be differentiated from Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD).

Epidemiology and Demographics

Estimated incidence of PPE is 6 to 64% of patients treated with chemotherapeutic drugs. However, the exact incidence of PPE is unknown, as most reports are isolated case reports or short case series.

Risk Factors

The most common and established risk factors are chemotherapeutic agents. The severity of the condition depends on the dose and frequency of the agent.

Screening

Natural History, Complications, and Prognosis

Prognosis is generally good and symptoms usually resolve within 1-2 weeks after stopping the causative chemotherapeutic agent.If left untreated, PPE can progress rapidly. PPE is not life threatening, but it can be very debilitating and impair quality of life.

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

X-ray

Echocardiography and Ultrasound

CT scan

MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Interventions

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

References