Osteoarthritis x ray

Revision as of 21:23, 16 November 2012 by Shankar Kumar (talk | contribs) (Created page with "__NOTOC__ {{Osteoarthritis}} {{CMG}} ==Overview== ==X Ray== Diagnosis is normally done through x-rays. This is possible because loss of cartilage, subchondral ("below...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Osteoarthritis Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Osteoarthritis from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Criteria

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

X Ray

CT

MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Osteoarthritis x ray On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Osteoarthritis x ray

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Osteoarthritis x ray

CDC on Osteoarthritis x ray

Osteoarthritis x ray in the news

Blogs on Osteoarthritis x ray

Directions to Hospitals Treating Osteoarthritis

Risk calculators and risk factors for Osteoarthritis x ray

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]

Overview

X Ray

Diagnosis is normally done through x-rays. This is possible because loss of cartilage, subchondral ("below cartilage") sclerosis, subchondral cysts, narrowing of the joint space between the articulating bones, and bone spur formation (osteophytes) show up clearly on x-rays. Plain films, however, often do not correlate well with the findings of physical examination of the affected joints.

With or without other techniques, such as MRI (magnetic resonance imaging), arthrocentesis and arthroscopy, diagnosis can be made by a careful study of the duration, location, the character of the joint symptoms, and the appearance of the joints themselves. As yet, there are no methods available to detect OA in its early and potentially treatable stages.

In 1990, the College of Rheumatology, using data from a multi-center study, developed a set of criteria for the based on hard tissue enlargement and swelling of certain joints. These criteria were found to be 92% sensitive and 98% specific for hand osteoarthritis versus other entities such as rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthropities [1].

Since 80% of all people will have evidence of osteoarthritis (even when only 20% are experiencing pain) it is important to keep in mind that the mere presence of osteoarthritis on imaging studies does mean that osteoarthritis is where any individuals pain is coming from. Other factors such as muscle, nerve and ligament may be involved.

Erosive osteoarthritis

  • X-rays of the hands usually reveal severe degenerative changes with osteophytes and subchondral sclerosis at the DIP and PIP joints of the fingers, and the CMC and IP joints of the thumb.
  • Central erosions due to destruction of articular cartilage are seen with relative sparing of the joint margins (Seagull sign).
  • Deformity at the distal joints with sparing of the MCPs can lead to mediolateral subluxation and contractures.

References

  1. Altman R, Alarcón G, Appelrouth D; et al. (1990). "The American College of Rheumatology criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis of the hand". Arthritis Rheum. 33 (11): 1601–10. PMID 2242058.

Template:WH Template:WS