Non small cell lung cancer other diagnostic studies: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 29: Line 29:
|-
|-
|style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #DCDCDC; font-weight: bold; text-align:center;"| [[Thoracotomy]]  
|style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #DCDCDC; font-weight: bold; text-align:center;"| [[Thoracotomy]]  
|style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;"| Allows the most thorough inspection and sampling of lymph node stations, may be followed by resection of tumor, if feasible
|style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;"|  
|style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;"| Most invasive approach, not indicated for staging alone, significant risk of procedure-related morbidity
*Allows the most thorough inspection and sampling of lymph node stations
*May be followed by resection of tumor, if feasible
|style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;"|
*Invasive approach
*Not indicated for staging alone
*Significant risk of procedure-related morbidity
|-
|-
|style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #DCDCDC; font-weight: bold; text-align:center;"| Left parasternal mediastinotomy (or anterior mediastinotomy)
|style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #DCDCDC; font-weight: bold; text-align:center;"| Left parasternal mediastinotomy (or anterior mediastinotomy)
|style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;"| Permits evaluation of the aortopulmonary window lymph nodes
|style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;"|  
|style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;"| More invasive; false-negative rate approximately 10%.
*Allows evaluation of the aortopulmonary window lymph nodes
|style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;"|  
*More invasive
*False-negative rate approximately 10%
|-
|-
|style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #DCDCDC; font-weight: bold; text-align:center;"| Chamberlain procedure  
|style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #DCDCDC; font-weight: bold; text-align:center;"| Chamberlain procedure  
|style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;"| Access to station 5 ([[aortopulmonary window]] lymph node)
|style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;"|  
|style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;"| Limited applications, invasive
*Access to station 5 ([[aortopulmonary window]] lymph node)
|style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;"|  
*Limited applications, invasive
|-
|-
|style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #DCDCDC; font-weight: bold; text-align:center;"| [[Mediastinoscopy|Cervical mediastinoscopy]]
|style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #DCDCDC; font-weight: bold; text-align:center;"| [[Mediastinoscopy|Cervical mediastinoscopy]]
|style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;"| Still considered the gold standard (usual comparitor) by many, excellent for 2RL 4RL
|style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;"|  
|style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;"| Does not cover all medastinal lymph node stations, particularly subcarinal lymph nodes (station 7), paraesophageal and pulmonary ligament lymph nodes (stations 8 and 9), the aortopulmonary window lymph nodes (station 5), and the anterior mediastinal lymph nodes (station 6); false-negative rate approximately 20%; invasive
*Considered the gold standard (usual comparitor)
*Excellent for 2RL 4RL
|style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;"|
*Invasive
*Does not cover all mediastinal lymph node stations; particularly subcarinal lymph nodes (station 7), paraesophageal and pulmonary ligament lymph nodes (stations 8 and 9).
*False-negative rate approximately 20%
|-
|-
|style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #DCDCDC; font-weight: bold; text-align:center;"| [[Thoracoscopy|Video-assisted thoracoscopy]]
|style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #DCDCDC; font-weight: bold; text-align:center;"| [[Thoracoscopy|Video-assisted thoracoscopy]]
|style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;"| Good for inferior mediastinum, station 5 and 6 lymph nodes
|style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;"|  
|style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;"| Invasive, does not cover superior anterior mediastinum
*Useful for the evaluation of inferior mediastinum, station 5 and 6 lymph nodes
|style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;"|  
*Invasive
*Does not cover superior anterior mediastinum
|-
|-
|style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #DCDCDC; font-weight: bold; text-align:center;"| Transthoracic percutaneous [[fine needle aspiration]] (FNA) under CT guidance
|style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #DCDCDC; font-weight: bold; text-align:center;"| Transthoracic percutaneous [[fine needle aspiration]] (FNA) under CT guidance
|style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;"| More widely available than some other methods
|style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;"|  
|style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;"| Traverses a lot of lung tissue, therefore high pneumothorax risk, some lymph node stations inaccessible
*Widely available than some other methods
|style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;"|
*Traverses a lot of lung tissue
*High pneumothorax risk
*Some lymph node stations inaccessible
|-
|-
|style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #DCDCDC; font-weight: bold; text-align:center;"| [[Bronchoscopy]] with blind transbronchial FNA (Wang needle)
|style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #DCDCDC; font-weight: bold; text-align:center;"| [[Bronchoscopy]] with blind transbronchial FNA (Wang needle)
|style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;"| Less invasive than above methods
|style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;"|  
|style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;"| Relatively low yield, not widely practiced, bleeding risk
*Less invasive than above methods
|style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;"|  
*Relatively low yield
*Not widely practiced
*Bleeding risk
|-
|-
|}
|}

Revision as of 15:43, 25 February 2016

Non Small Cell Lung Cancer Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Non Small Cell Lung Cancer from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

X-Ray

CT Scan

MRI

Ultrasound

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Management Approach

Stage I
Stage II
Stage III
Stage IV
Metastatic Cancer

Medical Therapy

Chemotherapy
Radiation Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Non small cell lung cancer other diagnostic studies On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Non small cell lung cancer other diagnostic studies

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Non small cell lung cancer other diagnostic studies

CDC on Non small cell lung cancer other diagnostic studies

Non small cell lung cancer other diagnostic studies in the news

Blogs on Non small cell lung cancer other diagnostic studies

Directions to Hospitals Treating Non small cell carcinoma of the lung

Risk calculators and risk factors for Non small cell lung cancer other diagnostic studies

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Maria Fernanda Villarreal, M.D. [2]

Overview

Other diagnostic modalities for non-small cell lung cancer, include: thoracotomy, bronchoscopy, mediastinoscopy, and transthoracic percutaneous fine needle aspiration.

Other Diagnostic Studies

  • Other diagnostic modalities for non-small cell lung cancer, include:
  • Thoracotomy
  • Bronchoscopy
  • Mediastinoscopy
  • Chamberlain procedure
  • Left parasternal mediastinotomy
  • Anterior mediastinotomy
  • The majority of these procedures allow staging of mediastinal lymph nodes.
  • The table below demonstrates the different types of diagnostic modalities in non small cell lung cancer arranged from the most to the least invasive.
Procedure Advantages Disadvantages
Thoracotomy
  • Allows the most thorough inspection and sampling of lymph node stations
  • May be followed by resection of tumor, if feasible
  • Invasive approach
  • Not indicated for staging alone
  • Significant risk of procedure-related morbidity
Left parasternal mediastinotomy (or anterior mediastinotomy)
  • Allows evaluation of the aortopulmonary window lymph nodes
  • More invasive
  • False-negative rate approximately 10%
Chamberlain procedure
  • Limited applications, invasive
Cervical mediastinoscopy
  • Considered the gold standard (usual comparitor)
  • Excellent for 2RL 4RL
  • Invasive
  • Does not cover all mediastinal lymph node stations; particularly subcarinal lymph nodes (station 7), paraesophageal and pulmonary ligament lymph nodes (stations 8 and 9).
  • False-negative rate approximately 20%
Video-assisted thoracoscopy
  • Useful for the evaluation of inferior mediastinum, station 5 and 6 lymph nodes
  • Invasive
  • Does not cover superior anterior mediastinum
Transthoracic percutaneous fine needle aspiration (FNA) under CT guidance
  • Widely available than some other methods
  • Traverses a lot of lung tissue
  • High pneumothorax risk
  • Some lymph node stations inaccessible
Bronchoscopy with blind transbronchial FNA (Wang needle)
  • Less invasive than above methods
  • Relatively low yield
  • Not widely practiced
  • Bleeding risk

References


Template:WikiDoc Sources