Dal-VESSEL Trial: Difference between revisions
Rim Halaby (talk | contribs) |
Rim Halaby (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
==Timeline== | ==Timeline== | ||
==Methods== | ==Methods== | ||
==Outcomes== | |||
==Results== | ==Results== | ||
Baseline flow-meddiated dilatation at the right brachial artery after 5 minutes of cuff occlusion, an endpoint that increases the vascular levels of endothelin and reactive oxygen species with a decrease of eNOS expression and nitrous oxide release, was almost equal in patients receiving placebo and those receiving dalcetrapib at approximately 4%. Changes did not significantly with both groups either. Similarly, hyperemia, an assessment of blood flow velocity, was not significantly different in either groups or when comparing to baseline hyperemia. | Baseline flow-meddiated dilatation at the right brachial artery after 5 minutes of cuff occlusion, an endpoint that increases the vascular levels of endothelin and reactive oxygen species with a decrease of eNOS expression and nitrous oxide release, was almost equal in patients receiving placebo and those receiving dalcetrapib at approximately 4%. Changes did not significantly with both groups either. Similarly, hyperemia, an assessment of blood flow velocity, was not significantly different in either groups or when comparing to baseline hyperemia. | ||
Revision as of 03:20, 20 September 2013
|
High Density Lipoprotein Microchapters |
|
Diagnosis |
|---|
|
Treatment |
|
Clinical Trials |
|
Case Studies |
|
Dal-VESSEL Trial On the Web |
|
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Dal-VESSEL Trial |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]
Official Title
A Randomized, Placebo-controlled Study of the Safety, Tolerability and Effect on Endothelial Function, as Measured by Flow Mediated Dilatation, of RO4607381 in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) or CHD Risk Equivalents.
Objectives
To assess the therapeutic and adverse effects of dalcetrapib on endothelial function, blood pressure, inflammatory markers, and lipid levels in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) or CHD risk equivalents
Timeline
Methods
Outcomes
Results
Baseline flow-meddiated dilatation at the right brachial artery after 5 minutes of cuff occlusion, an endpoint that increases the vascular levels of endothelin and reactive oxygen species with a decrease of eNOS expression and nitrous oxide release, was almost equal in patients receiving placebo and those receiving dalcetrapib at approximately 4%. Changes did not significantly with both groups either. Similarly, hyperemia, an assessment of blood flow velocity, was not significantly different in either groups or when comparing to baseline hyperemia.
Blood pressure levels throughout the study at 4,12, and 36 weeks did not significantly differ either compared to baseline in any group or even between groups. However, it was shown that the % of patients who are considered "non-dippers", i.e. those who do not have a nocturnal decrease in blood pressures, were decreased with dalcetrapib, while increased in placebo group. Electrolytes, creatinine, or glucose were also unchanged.
Measured inflamamtory markers ICAM-1, VCAM-1, IL6, MPO, t-PA, and PAI-1 were all the same when comparing groups or when comparing to baseline values. Only placebo-corrected Lp-PLA2 mass showed a 17.4% increase (p<0.001).
At baseline, HDL was almost similar in both placebo and dalcetrapib. There was a significant gradual increase in HDL levels ranging between 25-31% during week 4-36 (p<0.0001). In converse, CETP activity decreased gradually as well from a 51% decrease at week 4 to a 56% decrease at week 36 of dalcetrapib therapy (p<0.0001).
With dalcetrapib, Apo-A1 levels increased, Apo-B100 decreased, and triglyceride levels decreased signifincantly. LDL-C level decrease was only 4% and limited at week 4 only, but the resulst significant nonetheless (p<0.05).
The list of adverse events included mainly mild to moderate events, such as diarrhea, back pain, headache, nasopharyngitis, and influenza. Two patients of the dalcetrapib group and 3 patients of the placebo group had a non-fatal myocardial infarction; whereas there was 1 death and 1 hospitalization for ACS that occurred only in the placebo group. A total of 16 revascularization procedures were documented, 9 of which were in patients of the dalcetrapib group.
Conclusion
Dal-VESSEL trial conveys a reassuring side effect profile of dalcetrapib. The promising findings of the dal-VESSEL trial regarding the role of dalcetrapib as a CETP inhibitor in atherosclerosisare in line with the previous findings documented by dal-PLAQUE and dal-OUTCOMES trials.