Cysticercosis laboratory findings

Revision as of 19:30, 1 October 2012 by Rim Halaby (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Cysticercosis Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Cysticercosis from Other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

CT

MRI

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Case Studies

Case #1

Cysticercosis laboratory findings On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Cysticercosis laboratory findings

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Cysticercosis laboratory findings

CDC on Cysticercosis laboratory findings

Cysticercosis laboratory findings in the news

Blogs on Cysticercosis laboratory findings

Directions to Hospitals Treating Cysticercosis

Risk calculators and risk factors for Cysticercosis laboratory findings

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]

Please help WikiDoc by adding more content here. It's easy! Click here to learn about editing.

Overview

Laboratory Findings

Laboratory Diagnosis:

The definitive diagnosis consists of demonstrating the cysticercus in the tissue involved. Demonstration of Taenia solium eggs and proglottids in the feces diagnoses taeniasis and not cysticercosis. While suggestive, it does not necessarily prove that cysticercosis is present. Persons who are found to have eggs or proglottids in their feces should be evaluated serologically since autoinfection, resulting in cysticercosis, can occur.

Cysticercosis: Antibody Detection

Cysticercosis immunoblot

CDC's immunoblot assay with purified Taenia solium antigens has been acknowledged by the World Health Organization and the Pan American Health Organization as the immunodiagnostic test of choice for confirming a clinical and radiologic presumptive diagnosis of neurocysticercosis. CDC's immunoblot is based on detection of antibody to one or more of 7 lentil-lectin purified structural glycoprotein antigens from the larval cysts of T. solium in an immunoblot format. It is 100% specific and has a sensitivity superior to that of any other test yet evaluated. Serum specimens from 97% of parasitologically confirmed cases of cysticercosis have detectable antibodies. No serum samples from patients with other microbial infections react with any of the T. solium-specific antigens. The most important factors identified as determining positive immunoblot reactions are the numbers and stage of development of cysticerci. Cumulative clinical experience has confirmed that in patients with multiple (more than two) lesions, the test has more than 95% sensitivity. Seropositivity in biopsy-confirmed patients with single, enhancing parenchymal cysts was <50%; in clinically defined patients with a single cyst but who were not biopsied, sensitivity was 70%. Seropositivity in serum and CSF of patients with multiple but only calcified cysts was 82 and 77%, respectively. In all patients, regardless of their clinical presentation, the immunoblot assay is slightly more sensitive in serum than in CSF specimens: consequently, there is no need to obtain CSF solely for use in the immunoblot assay.

CDC's immunoblot is both more specific and more sensitive than enzyme immunoassay (EIA) systems with which it has been compared. Lack of specificity has been a major problem in most EIAs because of cross-reacting components in crude antigens derived from cysticerci; these components react with antibodies specific for other helminthic infections, especially echinococcosis and filariasis. Most partially purified fractions evaluated in an EIA appear to have lower sensitivity than crude antigens and do not necessarily achieve higher specificity. Assays employing crude antigens for the detection of antibody are not reliable for the identification of this disease; all positives and any negative strongly suspected of cysticercosis should be confirmed by immunoblot. Currently available antibody detection tests for cysticercosis do not distinguish between active and inactive infections and thus have not been useful in evaluating the outcomes and prognoses of medically treated patients. Both the CDC immunoblot and an EIA are commercially available in the United States.

Typical antibody reactions in CDC's immunoblot for cysticercosis. Individual sera from patients with either cysticercosis or echinococcosis were analyzed using the immunoblot for cysticercosis.

Cysticercosis-specific antibodies react with glycoproteins derived from T. solium cysts. The positions of the seven diagnostic glycoproteins are marked and designated according to their relative mobilities in SDS-PAGE. Sera from patients with cysticercosis react with at least one of the cysticercosis-specific proteins, whereas sera from patients with echinococcosis do not react with any of the seven diagnostic proteins.

References


Template:WikiDoc Sources