Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis laboratory findings

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Peritonitis main page

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

History & Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

Chest X Ray

CT

MRI

Echocardiography or Ultrasound

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis laboratory findings On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis laboratory findings

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis laboratory findings

CDC on Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis laboratory findings

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis laboratory findings in the news

Blogs on Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis laboratory findings

Directions to Hospitals Treating Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis

Risk calculators and risk factors for Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis laboratory findings

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] ; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Aditya Govindavarjhulla, M.B.B.S. [2] Guillermo Rodriguez Nava, M.D. [3]

Overview

Diagnosis requires paracentesis (needle drainage of the ascitic fluid). Ascites culture is negative in up to 60% of patients with clinical manifestations of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP), therefore, the diagnosis is based on the neutrophil count, which reaches its highest sensitivity with a cutoff neutrophil count of > 250/mm3.[1]

Laboratory Findings

Laboratory tests, most importantly ascitic fluid analysis is required for confirmation of diagnosis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.

Ascitic Fluid Analysis

  • A high index of suspicion must exist for ascitic fluid infection in a cirrhotic patient. Given the similarities in presentation between the variants of ascitic fluid infection and the inability to clinically distinguish spontaneous from secondary peritonitis, the diagnosis of SBP should be through abdominal paracentesis as it has been shown to be safe with a low risk for complication, even in patients with marked coagulopathy and thrombocytopenia.

Diagnostic paracentesis

  • Performed in all cirrhotics with ascites:
  1. upon admission to the hospital
  2. who develop any change in clinical status including fever, abdominal pain, mental status changes, ileus, or septic shock
  3. who develop laboratory abnormalities such as a leukocytosis, acidosis, or renal failure
  4. during episodes of gastrointestinal bleeding prior to the administration of antibiotics
  • The following tests are recommended for suspected infection of the ascitic fluid:
  1. Cell counts with differential : Absoulte neutrophil count - a total count of >250 cells/mm3 confirm the diagnosis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.most sensitive and single best

test in diagnosing ascitic fluid infection [45]. Not all cases in which the PMN count is above this threshold represent infection, and values in this range can be seen with hemorrhage into ascites, peritoneal carcinomatosis, or pancreatic ascites. A useful distinguishing feature is that the PMN is usually not the predominant cell type in these cases

  1. Culture (in blood culture bottles)
  2. Gram’s stain
  3. Total protein
  4. Lactate dehydrogenase
  5. Glucose
  6. Amylase
  7. Albumin (if SAAG unknown)
  8. Serum-ascites albumin gradient (if not calculated before)

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 European Association for the Study of the Liver (2010). "EASL clinical practice guidelines on the management of ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, and hepatorenal syndrome in cirrhosis". J Hepatol. 53 (3): 397–417. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2010.05.004. PMID 20633946.
  2. Caly WR, Strauss E (1993). "A prospective study of bacterial infections in patients with cirrhosis". J Hepatol. 18 (3): 353–8. PMID 8228129.
  3. Viallon A, Zeni F, Pouzet V, Lambert C, Quenet S, Aubert G; et al. (2000). "Serum and ascitic procalcitonin levels in cirrhotic patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: diagnostic value and relationship to pro-inflammatory cytokines". Intensive Care Med. 26 (8): 1082–8. PMID 11030164.


Template:WikiDoc Sources