Tabes Dorsalis diagnostic study of choice

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Tabes Dorsalis Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Tabes Dorsalis from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications, and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

CT

MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Tabes Dorsalis diagnostic study of choice On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Tabes Dorsalis diagnostic study of choice

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Tabes Dorsalis diagnostic study of choice

CDC on Tabes Dorsalis diagnostic study of choice

Tabes Dorsalis diagnostic study of choice in the news

Blogs on Tabes Dorsalis diagnostic study of choice

Directions to Hospitals Treating Tabes Dorsalis

Risk calculators and risk factors for Tabes Dorsalis diagnostic study of choice

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mohamadmostafa Jahansouz M.D.[2]

Overview

The first step laboratory test when there is a clinical suspicious toward tabes dorsalis is a venereal disease research laboratory test (VDRL) or rapid plasma reagin (RPR). Fluorescent treponemal antibody absorbed (FTA-ABS) test is the gold standard test for the diagnosis of tabes dorsalis.

Diagnostic Study of Choice

Study of choice:

The comparison table for diagnostic studies of choice for tabes dorsalis

Sensitivity Specificity
FTA-ABS
  • 84% for detecting primary syphilis infection
  • 100% sensitivity for detecting syphilis infection in secondary and tertiary stages[2]
96%[2]
VDRL/RPR
  • 78% to 86% for detecting primary syphilis infection
  • 100% for detecting secondary syphilis infection, and 95% to 98% for detecting latent syphilis infection[2]
85% to 99%[2]

References

  1. Lin LR, Fu ZG, Dan B, Jing GJ, Tong ML, Chen DT; et al. (2010). "Development of a colloidal gold-immunochromatography assay to detect immunoglobulin G antibodies to Treponema pallidum with TPN17 and TPN47". Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 68 (3): 193–200. doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2010.06.019. PMID 20846810.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Calonge N, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2004). "Screening for syphilis infection: recommendation statement". Ann Fam Med. 2 (4): 362–5. PMC 1466700. PMID 15335137.

Template:WH Template:WS