Sensitivity (tests)
You don't need to be Editor-In-Chief to add or edit content to WikiDoc. You can begin to add to or edit text on this WikiDoc page by clicking on the edit button at the top of this page. Next enter or edit the information that you would like to appear here. Once you are done editing, scroll down and click the Save page button at the bottom of the page.
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Phone:617-525-6884
Please Take Over This Page and Apply to be Editor-In-Chief for this topic: There can be one or more than one Editor-In-Chief. You may also apply to be an Associate Editor-In-Chief of one of the subtopics below. Please mail us [2] to indicate your interest in serving either as an Editor-In-Chief of the entire topic or as an Associate Editor-In-Chief for a subtopic. Please be sure to attach your CV and or biographical sketch.
Sensitivity, or recall rate, is a statistical measure of how well a binary classification test correctly identifies a condition, whether this is medical screening tests picking up on a disease, or quality control in factories deciding if a new product is good enough to be sold.
The results of the screening test are compared to some absolute (Gold standard); for example, for a medical test to determine if a person has a certain disease, the sensitivity to the disease is the probability that if the person has the disease, the test will be positive.
The sensitivity is the proportion of true positives of all diseased cases in the population. It is a parameter of the test.
High sensitivity is required when early diagnosis and treatment is beneficial, and when the disease is infectious.
Worked example
- Relationships among terms
| Condition (as determined by "Gold standard") | ||||
| True | False | |||
| Test outcome | Positive | True Positive | False Positive (Type I error, P-value) | → Positive predictive value |
| Negative | False Negative (Type II error) | True Negative | → Negative predictive value | |
| ↓ Sensitivity | ↓ Specificity | |||
- A worked example
- the Fecal occult blood (FOB) screen test is used in 203 people to look for bowel cancer:
| Patients with bowel cancer (as confirmed on endoscopy) | ||||
| True | False | ? | ||
| FOB test | Positive | TP = 2 | FP = 18 | = TP / (TP + FP) = 2 / (2 + 18) = 2 / 20 ≡ 10% |
| Negative | FN = 1 | TN = 182 | = TN / (TN + FN) 182 / (1 + 182) = 182 / 183 ≡ 99.5% | |
| ↓ = TP / (TP + FN) = 2 / (2 + 1) = 2 / 3 ≡ 66.67% | ↓ = TN / (FP + TN) = 182 / (18 + 182) = 182 / 200 ≡ 91% | |||
Related calculations
- False positive rate (α) = FP / (FP + TN) = 18 / (18 + 182) = 9% = 1 - specificity
- False negative rate (β) = FN / (TP + FN) = 1 / (2 + 1) = 33% = 1 - sensitivity
- Power = 1 − β
Hence with large numbers of false positives and few false negatives, a positive FOB screen test is in itself poor at confirming cancer (PPV=10%) and further investigations must be undertaken, it will though pickup 66.7% of all cancers (the sensitivity). However as a screening test, a negative result is very good at reassuring that a patient does not have cancer (NPV=99.5%) and at this initial screen correctly identifies 91% of those who do not have cancer (the specificity).
Definition
A sensitivity of 100% means that the test recognizes all sick people as such.
Sensitivity alone does not tell us how well the test predicts other classes (that is, about the negative cases). In the binary classification, as illustrated above, this is the corresponding specificity test, or equivalently, the sensitivity for the other classes.
Sensitivity is not the same as the positive predictive value (ratio of true positives to combined true and false positives), which is as much a statement about the proportion of actual positives in the population being tested as it is about the test.
The calculation of sensitivity does not take into account indeterminate test results. If a test cannot be repeated, the options are to exclude indeterminate samples from analyses (but the number of exclusions should be stated when quoting sensitivity), or, alternatively, indeterminate samples can be treated as false negatives (which gives the worst-case value for sensitivity and may therefore underestimate it).
Terminology in information retrieval
In information retrieval- positive predictive value is called precision, and sensitivity is called recall.
F-measure: can be used as a single measure of performance of the test. The F-measure is the harmonic mean of precision and recall:
In the traditional language of statistical hypothesis testing, the sensitivity of a test is called the statistical power of the test, although the word power in that context has a more general usage that is not applicable in the present context. A sensitive test will have fewer Type II errors.
See also
- specificity
- binary classification
- Negative predictive value
- Positive predictive value
- receiver operating characteristic
- Selectivity
- statistical significance
- False positive
- False negative
- Type I and type II errors
Online Calculators
References
- Altman DG, Bland JM (1994). "Diagnostic tests. 1: Sensitivity and specificity". BMJ 308 (6943): 1552. PMID 8019315.
External links
- Sensitivity and Specificity Medical University of South Carolina
fr:Sensibilité (statistique) ia:Sensitivitate he:רגישות (מדד) ja:感度 no:Sensitivitetsu:Sensitivity (tests) sv:Sensitivitet
Acknowledgement and Attribution Regarding Sources of Content
Some of the initial content on this page may be incorporated in part from copyleft sources in the public domain including wikis such as Wikipedia and AskDrWiki. Drug information for patients came from the The National Library of Medicine. Infectious disease information may have come from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Differential Diagnoses are drawn from clinicians as well as an amalgamation of 3 sources: 1.The Disease Database; 2. Kahan, Scott, Smith, Ellen G. In A Page: Signs and Symptoms. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing, 2004:3; 3. Sailer, Christian, Wasner, Susanne. Differential Diagnosis Pocket. Hermosa Beach, CA: Borm Bruckmeir Publishing LLC, 2002:7 .
