IntraUterine System

Jump to: navigation, search
IntraUterine System
Background
B.C. type Intrauterine
First use 1990 (Mirena)

1976 (Progestasert)

Failure rates (first year, Mirena)
Perfect use 0.2%
Typical use ?%
Usage
Duration effect 5 years
Reversibility 2-6 months
User reminders Check thread position after each period
Clinic review Annually
Advantages and Disadvantages
STD protection No
Periods Causes menstrual irregularity, periods are usually lighter or none at all (amenorrhea)
Weight No proven effect
Benefits No need remember take any daily action
Risks Ovarian cysts (usually benign)
Small risk PID, uterine perforation
Medical notes
(As for IUDs) when control heavy periods also required.

WikiDoc Resources for IntraUterine System

Articles

Most recent articles on IntraUterine System

Most cited articles on IntraUterine System

Review articles on IntraUterine System

Articles on IntraUterine System in N Eng J Med, Lancet, BMJ

Media

Powerpoint slides on IntraUterine System

Images of IntraUterine System

Photos of IntraUterine System

Podcasts & MP3s on IntraUterine System

Videos on IntraUterine System

Evidence Based Medicine

Cochrane Collaboration on IntraUterine System

Bandolier on IntraUterine System

TRIP on IntraUterine System

Clinical Trials

Ongoing Trials on IntraUterine System at Clinical Trials.gov

Trial results on IntraUterine System

Clinical Trials on IntraUterine System at Google

Guidelines / Policies / Govt

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse on IntraUterine System

NICE Guidance on IntraUterine System

NHS PRODIGY Guidance

FDA on IntraUterine System

CDC on IntraUterine System

Books

Books on IntraUterine System

News

IntraUterine System in the news

Be alerted to news on IntraUterine System

News trends on IntraUterine System

Commentary

Blogs on IntraUterine System

Definitions

Definitions of IntraUterine System

Patient Resources / Community

Patient resources on IntraUterine System

Discussion groups on IntraUterine System

Patient Handouts on IntraUterine System

Directions to Hospitals Treating IntraUterine System

Risk calculators and risk factors for IntraUterine System

Healthcare Provider Resources

Symptoms of IntraUterine System

Causes & Risk Factors for IntraUterine System

Diagnostic studies for IntraUterine System

Treatment of IntraUterine System

Continuing Medical Education (CME)

CME Programs on IntraUterine System

International

IntraUterine System en Espanol

IntraUterine System en Francais

Business

IntraUterine System in the Marketplace

Patents on IntraUterine System

Experimental / Informatics

List of terms related to IntraUterine System


The IntraUterine System or IUS is a hormonal contraceptive device that is placed in the uterus. An IUS has a hormone cylinder that releases a progestin (progestogen) called levonorgestrel. The only brand currently available is the T-frame LNG-20 IUS, marketed as Mirena Coil by Schering Health and Berlex Laboratories.

The term IUS is used in the United Kingdom to distinguish the hormonal intrauterine contraceptive from copper- or silver-based IUDs. In the United States, no distinction is made between hormonal and copper/silver devices. In the US, all intrauterine contraceptives are referred to with the term IUD,[1] and the term IUS is not used.

Clinical uses

  • Contraception

Fitting

The IUS can only be fitted by a qualified medical practitioner. The device should be inserted according to the manufacturer's instructions using aseptic technique to avoid introduction of bacteria into the uterus. Antibiotics should be given before insertion to women at high risk for endocarditis (inflammation of the membrane lining the heart), but should not be used routinely.[5]

During the placement appointment, the cervix is dilated in order to sound (measure) the uterus and insert the IUS. Cervix dilation is uncomfortable and, for some women, painful. Doctors often advise women to take painkillers before the procedure to reduce pain and discomfort. Insertion may be more comfortable if done midcycle, when the cervix is naturally dilated.[6]

Once in place, the IUS is approved for birth control for up to 5 years. The cumulative 5-year pregnancy rate is estimated to be 0.7%.[7]

Mechanisms of contraception

The Mirena is intended to initially release a daily dose of 20 micrograms levonorgestral (a progestin). It is not known exactly how Mirena works. It has several effects on the reproductive system, which are believed to explain its use to prevent pregnancy.

  • Frequency of ovulation is reduced.[8]
  • Cervical mucus is changed to obstruct passage of sperm through the cervix.[9]
  • The presence of a foreign body in the uterus prompts the release of leukocytes and prostaglandins by the endometrium, substances that are hostile to both sperm and eggs.[10]
  • The endometrium is thinned.[9] It has been suggested that this inhibits implantation of embryos, though no experiment has yet confirmed or disproved this theory.

Removal

Generally IUS removal is easiest if undertaken towards the end of a women's period and involves a doctor or trained nurse using a pair of forceps to take hold of the IUS's thread and gently retract.

A "lost coil" occurs when the thread can not be felt by a women on routine checking and is not seen on speculum examination.[11] Various thread collector devices or simple forceps may then be used to try and grasp the device through the cervix.[12] In the rare cases when this is unsuccessful, an ultrasound scan may be arranged to check the position of the coil and exclude its perforation through into the abdominal cavity or its unrecognised previous expulsion. Hysteroscopy is very rarely needed.

After removal of the IUS normal fertility is regained after a few months, with a near normal 80% of women able to conceive within 12 months.

Contraindications

The WHO Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use and RCOG Faculty of Family Planning & Reproductive Health Care (FFPRHC) UK Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use list the following as conditions where insertion of a levonorgestrel IUS is not usually recommended or should not be used because of an unacceptable health risk:[13][14]

Conditions where the theoretical or proven risks usually outweigh the advantages of inserting a levonorgestrel IUS:

Conditions which represent an unacceptable health risk if a levonorgestrel IUS is inserted:

Side effects and complications

Location of device

Following insertion, the IUS may be expelled through the cervix. An expulsion rate of 4% was observed in the manufacturer's clinical trials, with most (3%) occurring in the first year of use. Expulsion is more common in younger women, women who have not had children, and when an IUS is inserted immediately after childbirth or abortion.[15][16][17]

A rare but potentially serious complication is that of uterine perforation. This may occur either during the device's insertion, or from its later embedment into the myometrium (uterine wall) and subsequent migration through to the intra-abdominal cavity. Perforation can cause internal scarring, infection, or damage to other organs, and may require surgery. Uterine perforation has been reported at rates ranging from 1 to 2.6 per 1000 insertions. It is believed that perforations are significantly underreported, however, and actual perforation rates are likely higher.[18]

Both expulsion and perforation result in loss of contraceptive cover and the position of the thread of the IUS should be self-checked at least once per menstrual cycle to verify that it is still in place, or, in the absence of menstrual cycles, once per month.

The string(s) may be felt by some men during intercourse. If this is problematic, the provider may tuck the strings behind the cervix, cut the strings shorter, or in more extreme cases cut the strings to level with the cervix. Cutting the strings even with the cervix prevents the woman from checking the device's correct placement, and may complicate removal.

Pelvic inflammatory disease and sexually transmitted diseases

Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) is caused by certain sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). PID is a serious condition that may result in infertility. In women who have STDs, an IUD will increase the risk of PID. Therefore, IUDs are not recommended for women at high risk of STDs.[19]

Women who have more than one sexual partner, or whose partners have more than one sexual partner, are at increased risk for STDs. Younger women are statistically at higher risk for STDs.

An animal study suggested that progestin-only hormonal contraceptives such as Mirena might increase the risk of HIV transmission, because of the thinning of the vaginal walls caused by these methods.[20] However, a number of studies of human populations showed that progestin contraceptive use does not increase the risk of acquiring HIV.[21]

However, like the Pill and other non-barrier forms of contraception, the IUS offers no protection against sexually transmitted disease.

Postpartum and post-abortion insertion

An IUS may be inserted immediately postpartum (within 48 hours). With insertions after 48 hours, perforation of the uterus is more likely to occur when uterine involution is incomplete; involution usually completes by 4-6 weeks postpartum.[16] Special considerations apply to women who plan to breastfeed.

Also to allow for uterine involution, insertion of an IUS is not recommended for women who have had a D&E abortion (second-trimester abortion) within the past four weeks.[6]

To reduce the risk of infection, insertion of an IUS is not recommended for women who have had a medical abortion but have not yet had an ultrasound to confirm that the abortion was complete, or who have not yet had their first menstruation following the chemical abortion.[6]

Expulsion is more common when an IUS is inserted immediately after childbirth or abortion.[16][17]

Hormonal side effects

Localised

Menstrual periods become lighter, or, in about 20% of women, stop completely within one year of insertion.[7] Irregular bleeding is common in the first few months after insertion, with the average user reporting 16 days of bleeding or spotting in the first month of use, but this diminishes to about four days at 12 months.[22][23]

Systemic

The progestin in an IUS is intended to be released at a lower dose than that used in other progestogen-only contraceptives such as the mini-pill or Norplant (blood levels of levonorgestrel in Mirena users are half those found in Norplant users and one-tenth those found in users of levonorgestrel-only pills).[24]

Enlarged follicles (ovarian cysts) have been diagnosed in about 12% of the subjects using a levonorgestrel IUS. Most of these follicles are asymptomatic, although some may be accompanied by pelvic pain or dyspareunia. In most cases the enlarged follicles disappear spontaneously during two to three months observation. Surgical intervention is not usually required.[7]

Nursing mothers

There is an increased risk of perforation in women who are lactating.[18]

Progestogen-only contraceptives such as an IUS are not believed to affect milk supply or infant growth.[25] However, a study in the Mirena application for FDA approval found a lower continuation of breastfeeding at 75 days in IUS users (44%) versus copper IUD users (79%).[26]

Levornogestrel is found in nursing infants at 7% of the concentration found in their mothers using the Mirena IUS.[7] A six-year study of breastfed infants whose mothers used a levonorgestrel-only method of birth control found the infants had increased risk of respiratory infections and eye infections, though a lower risk of neurological conditions, compared to infants whose mothers used a copper IUD.[27] No longer-term studies have been performed to assess the long-term effects on infants of levornogestrel in breast milk.

There are conflicting recommendations about use of Mirena while breastfeeding. The U.S. FDA does not recommend any hormonal method, including Mirena, as a first choice contraceptives for nursing mothers.[7] The World Health Organization recommends against immediate postpartum insertion, citing increased expulsion rates. It also reports concerns about potential effects on the infant's liver and brain development in the first six weeks postpartum. However, it recommends offering Mirena as a contraceptive option beginning at six weeks postpartum even to nursing women.[28] Planned Parenthood offers Mirena as a contraceptive option for breastfeeding women beginning at four weeks postpartum.[6]

Effect on cancer rates

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has concluded that the carcinogenic potential of Mirena is low.[29] According to a 1999 evaluation of the studies performed on progestin-only birth control by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, there is some evidence that progestin-only birth control reduces the risk of endometrial cancer. The IARC concluded that there is no evidence progestin-only birth control increases the risk of any cancer, though the available studies were too small to be definitively conclusive.[30] The use of progestin alone in treatment of menopause has been associated with a doubling of risk for breast cancer versus nonuse.[31]

Because breast cancer cells are often hormone-sensitive, Mirena and other hormonal birth control methods are not recommended for women who have, have had, or suspect they have breast cancer.[7]

Pregnancy

Although the pregnancy rate during IUS use may be low, it is not a 100% effective method of birth control. If pregnancy does occur, presence of the IUD increases the risk of miscarriage, particularly during the second trimester. It also increases the risk of premature delivery. These increased risks end if the IUD is removed after pregnancy is discovered.[32] No pattern of birth defects has been suggested by the 35 babies for whom birth outcomes were available at the time of FDA approval.[33]

As many as half of pregnancies that occur in Mirena users may be ectopic. The incidence rate of ectopics is approximately 1 per 1000 users per year.[34]

Bone Density

No evidence has been identified to suggest Mirena affects bone mineral density (BMD).[35] The only published study on the effect of Mirena on BMD showed that long-term users, at 7 years of use, had similar BMD at the midshaft of the ulna and at the distal radius as nonusers matched by age and BMI. In addition, BMD measurements were similar to the expected values for women in the same age group as the participants. The authors of the study said their results were predictable since it is well established that the main factor responsible for bone loss in women is hypoestrogenism and, in agreement with previous reports, they found estradiol levels in Mirena users to be normal.[36]

Types of IntraUterine Systems

Progestasert was the first hormonal uterine device, developed in 1976[37] and manufactured until 2001. It contained progesterone that was released at a rate of 65 micrograms per day.[37] In most countries it was replaced annually, though it was approved for 18 months of use in France. It had a failure rate of 2% per year.[38]

Development and studies of the Mirena Coil began in the 1970s.[39] Schering Health distributes Mirena outside the United States, while Berlex distributes it inside the United States. Both companies have worked with the Population Council, a non-profit organization that has worked with other contraceptive manufacturers (including Wyeth, maker of Norplant).

Mirena was first marketed commercially in Finland in 1990, but not approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration until 2000. It is intended to initially release 20 micrograms of levonorgestral per day and may be used for five years.

Contrel, the Belgian company that developed the frameless GyneFix IUD, is developing a lower-dose (14 micrograms levonorgestrel per day) T-frame IUS named Femilis. Femilis would come in a smaller size (Femilis Slim) for nulliparous women. It would be inserted without a plunger, and it is hoped its performance would be less dependent on the experience of the health care professional.

Several trials with positive results have been done on a frameless IUS called FibroPlant-LNG (also from Contrel). FibroPlant is anchored to the fundus of the uterus rather than being held in by a frame. It initially releases 14 micrograms of levonorgestrel per day, and may be used for at least three years. As of 2005, it was not commercially available.[40]

See also

References

  • "IUDs—An Update". Population Information Program, The Johns Hopkins School of Public Health. Volume XXIII (Number 5). 1995. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  • FDA (2000). "Medical review" (PDF scanned image). - on Berlex Laboratories' Mirena application

External links

Footnotes

  1. Planned Parenthood - Intrauterine Devices: national health care provider describes Paragard and Mirena as IUDs.
  2. Petta C, Ferriani R, Abrao M, Hassan D, Rosa E Silva J, Podgaec S, Bahamondes L (2005). "Randomized clinical trial of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system and a depot GnRH analogue for the treatment of chronic pelvic pain in women with endometriosis". Hum Reprod. 20 (7): 1993–8. PMID 15790607.
  3. Marjoribanks J, Lethaby A, Farquhar C (2006). "Surgery versus medical therapy for heavy menstrual bleeding". Cochrane Database Syst Rev: CD003855. PMID 16625593.
  4. Faundes A, Alvarez F, Brache V, Tejada A (1988). "The role of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device in the prevention and treatment of iron deficiency anemia during fertility regulation". Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 26 (3): 429–33. PMID 2900174.
  5. IUDs—An Update. "Procedures for Providing IUDs".
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 "Understanding IUDs". Planned Parenthood. July 2005. Retrieved 2006-10-08.
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 Bayer (2007). "Mirena U.S. Product Information" (PDF). Retrieved 2007-05-04.
  8. FDA Medical Review p.36
  9. 9.0 9.1 FDA Medical Review p.12
  10. Ortiz M, Croxatto H (1987). "The mode of action of IUDs". Contraception. 36 (1): 37–53. PMID 3311625.
  11. Nijhuis J, Schijf C, Eskes T (1985). "The lost IUD: don't look too far for it". Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 129 (30): 1409–10. PMID 3900746.
  12. Kaplan N (1976). "Letter: Lost IUD". Obstet Gynecol. 47 (4): 508–9. PMID 1256735.
  13. WHO (2004). "Intrauterine devices (IUDs)". Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use (3rd ed. ed.). Geneva: Reproductive Health and Research, WHO. ISBN 92-4-156266-8.
  14. FFPRHC (2006). "The UK Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use (2005/2006)" (PDF). Retrieved 2007-05-04.
  15. IUDs—An Update. "Chapter 2.7:Expulsion".
  16. 16.0 16.1 16.2 IUDs—An Update. "Chapter 3.3 Postpartum Insertion".
  17. 17.0 17.1 IUDs—An Update. "Chapter 3.4 Postabortion Insertion".
  18. 18.0 18.1 Van Houdenhoven K, van Kaam K, van Grootheest A, Salemans T, Dunselman G (2006). "Uterine perforation in women using a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system" (PDF). Contraception. 73 (3): 257–60. PMID 16472566. Retrieved 2006-07-29.
  19. IUDs—An Update. "Sidebar: WHO Scientific Group Updates Eligibility Guidelines for Copper IUDs".
  20. "The influence of hormones and HIV genital transmission in women". Update Natl Minor AIDS Counc: 9–11. PMID 11367434.
  21. "Progesterone-HIV link questioned by new studies". AIDS Alert. 11 (7): 76–8. 1996. PMID 11363549.
    "Progesterone and STDs: selected studies". Network. 16 (4): 20–1. 1996. PMID 12291589.
    Kiddugavu M, Makumbi F, Wawer M, Serwadda D, Sewankambo N, Wabwire-Mangen F, Lutalo T, Meehan M, Gray R (2003). "Hormonal contraceptive use and HIV-1 infection in a population-based cohort in Rakai, Uganda". AIDS. 17 (2): 233–40. PMID 12545084.
  22. McCarthy L (2006). "Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System (Mirena) for Contraception". Am Fam Physician. 73 (10): 1799-. Retrieved 2007-05-04.
  23. Rönnerdag M, Odlind V (1999). "Health effects of long-term use of the intrauterine levonorgestrel-releasing system. A follow-up study over 12 years of continuous use". Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 78 (8): 716–21. PMID 10468065.
  24. FDA Medical Review p.6
  25. Truitt S, Fraser A, Grimes D, Gallo M, Schulz K. "Combined hormonal versus nonhormonal versus progestin-only contraception in lactation". Cochrane Database Syst Rev: CD003988. PMID 12804497.
  26. FDA Medical Review p.37
  27. Schiappacasse V, Díaz S, Zepeda A, Alvarado R, Herreros C (2002). "Health and growth of infants breastfed by Norplant contraceptive implants users: a six-year follow-up study". Contraception. 66 (1): 57–65. PMID 12169382.
  28. (2004). "Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use" (PDF). Third Edition. World Health Organization. Retrieved on 2006-08-16.p.101, 113
  29. FDA CDER (2000). "Mirena Pharmacology Review" (PDF). FDA. Retrieved 2006-09-05.
  30. (1999). "Hormonal Contraceptives, Progestogens Only". International Agency for Research on Cancer. Retrieved on 2006-10-08.
  31. Newcomb P, Titus-Ernstoff L, Egan K, Trentham-Dietz A, Baron J, Storer B, Willett W, Stampfer M (2002). "Postmenopausal estrogen and progestin use in relation to breast cancer risk". Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 11 (7): 593–600. PMID 12101105.
  32. IUDs-An Update. Chapter 2.8: Intrauterine Pregnancy.
  33. FDA Medical Review p. 5,41
  34. FDA Medical Review pp. 3-4
  35. Faculty of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care Clinical Effectiveness Unit (2004). "FFPRHC Guidance (April 2004). The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) in contraception and reproductive health" (PDF). J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 30 (2): 99–109. PMID 15086994.
  36. Bahamondes L, Espejo-Arce X, Hidalgo MM, Hidalgo-Regina C, Teatin-Juliato C, Petta CA (2006). "A cross-sectional study of the forearm bone density of long-term users of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system". Hum Reprod. 21 (5): 1316–9. PMID 16373404.
  37. 37.0 37.1 IUDs—An Update. Chapter 2: Types of IUDs.
  38. "Birth Control Options: The Progestasert Intrauterine Device (IUD)". Wyoming Health Council. 2004. Retrieved 2006-07-16.
  39. FDA Medical Review p.10
  40. "New Contraceptive Choices". Population Reports, INFO Project, Center for Communication Programs. The Johns Hopkins School of Public Health. M (19). April 2005. Retrieved 2006-07-14. Chapter 9: Intrauterine Devices.


de:Hormonspirale no:Hormonspiral fi:Hormonikierukka



Linked-in.jpg