Aortic stenosis electrocardiogram

Jump to: navigation, search
Siren.gif

Resident
Survival
Guide

Aortic Stenosis Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Aortic Stenosis from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Cardiac Stress Test

Electrocardiogram

Chest X Ray

CT

MRI

Echocardiography

Cardiac Catheterization

Aortic Valve Area

Aortic Valve Area Calculation

Treatment

General Approach

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Percutaneous Aortic Balloon Valvotomy (PABV) or Aortic Valvuloplasty

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR)

TAVR vs SAVR
Critical Pathway
Patient Selection
Imaging
Evaluation
Valve Types
TAVR Procedure
Post TAVR management
AHA/ACC Guideline Recommendations

Follow Up

Prevention

Precautions and Prophylaxis

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Aortic stenosis electrocardiogram On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Aortic stenosis electrocardiogram

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Aortic stenosis electrocardiogram

CDC on Aortic stenosis electrocardiogram

Aortic stenosis electrocardiogram in the news

Blogs on Aortic stenosis electrocardiogram

Directions to Hospitals Treating Aortic stenosis electrocardiogram

Risk calculators and risk factors for Aortic stenosis electrocardiogram

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-In-Chief: Mohammed A. Sbeih, M.D. [2]; Lakshmi Gopalakrishnan, M.B.B.S. [3]; Usama Talib, BSc, MD [4] Assistant Editor-In-Chief: Kristin Feeney, B.S. [5]

Overview

The electrocardiogram in the patient with moderate to severe aortic stenosis may reveal left ventricular hypertrophy and heart block.

Electrocardiogram

  • Progressive concentric hypertrophy of the left ventricular wall may lead to larger QRS complexes, especially observed in leads V1-V6. The S wave in V1 is deep, the R wave in V4 is high. Often some ST depression can be seen in leads V5-V6, which is in this setting is called a left ventricular strain pattern.

Criteria for LVH

To diagnose left ventricular hypertrophy on the EKG one of the following criteria should be met: [2][3]

  • Sokolow-Lyon criteria:
  • R in V5 or V6 + S in V1 > 35 mm
  • Other criteria:
  • R > 26 mm in V5 or V6
  • R > 20 mm in I, II or III
  • R > 12 mm in aVL (in the absence of left anterior fascicular block)
  • Cornell criteria has different values in men and women:
  • R in aVL and S in V3 > 28 mm in men
  • R in aVL and S in V3 > 20 mm in women
  • In the Romhilt-Estes Score,[4]:
  • LVH is likely with 4 or more points, and
  • LVH is present with 5 or more points [5].

Examples of EKG Findings in patients with AS

Shown below is an electrocardiogram depicting left ventricular hypertrophy.

LVH-ECG


Shown below is an EKG depicting left ventricular hypertrophy and subendocardial ischemia.

EKG of a patient with LVH and subendocardial ischemia leading to positive cardiovascular markers in blood testing.


Shown below is an EKG depicting left ventricular hypertrophy and left ventricular strain pattern.

Left ventricular hypertrophy; left ventricular strain due to aortic stenosis.


Copyleft image obtained courtesy of ECGpedia, http://en.ecgpedia.org

2008 ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Valvular Heart Disease - Evaluation of Asymptomatic Adolescents or Young Adults With Aortic Stenosis (DO NOT EDIT)[6]

Class I
"1. An ECG is recommended yearly in the asymptomatic adolescent or young adult with AS who has a Doppler mean gradient greater than 30 mm Hg or a peak velocity greater than 3.5 m per second (peak gradient greater than 50 mm Hg) and every 2 years if the echocardiographic Doppler mean gradient is less than or equal to 30 mm Hg or the peak velocity is less than or equal to 3.5 m per second (peak gradient less than or equal to 50 mm Hg). (Level of Evidence: C)"

References

  1. Markku Kupari, Heikki Turto & Jyri Lommi (2005). "Left ventricular hypertrophy in aortic valve stenosis: preventive or promotive of systolic dysfunction and heart failure?". European heart journal. 26 (17): 1790–1796. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehi290. PMID 15860517. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  2. Oliver J. Rider, Ntobeko Ntusi, Sacha C. Bull, Richard Nethononda, Vanessa Ferreira, Cameron J. Holloway, David Holdsworth, Masliza Mahmod, Jennifer J. Rayner, Rajarshi Banerjee, Saul Myerson, Hugh Watkins & Stefan Neubauer (2016). "Improvements in ECG accuracy for diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy in obesity". Heart (British Cardiac Society). 102 (19): 1566–1572. doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2015-309201. PMID 27486142. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  3. P. N. Casale, R. B. Devereux, P. Kligfield, R. R. Eisenberg, D. H. Miller, B. S. Chaudhary & M. C. Phillips (1985). "Electrocardiographic detection of left ventricular hypertrophy: development and prospective validation of improved criteria". Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 6 (3): 572–580. PMID 3161926. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  4. Romhilt DW, Bove KE, Norris RJ; et al. (1969). "A critical appraisal of the electrocardiographic criteria for the diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy". Circulation. 40 (2): 185–95. PMID 4240354. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  5. Romhilt DW, Estes EH (1968). "A point-score system for the ECG diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy". Am. Heart J. 75 (6): 752–8. PMID 4231231. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  6. Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K; et al. (2008). "2008 Focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons". Circulation. 118 (15): e523–661. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.190748. PMID 18820172. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)


Cardiology


Linked-in.jpg